Pesticidal genes from brevibacillus and methods for their use

ABSTRACT

Compositions and methods for conferring insecticidal activity to bacteria, plants, plant cells, tissues and seeds are provided. Compositions including a coding sequence for a  Brevibacillus -derived delta-endotoxin polypeptide are provided. The coding sequences can be used in DNA constructs or expression cassettes for transformation and expression in plants and bacteria. Compositions also include transformed bacteria, plants, plant cells, tissues, and seeds. In particular, isolated delta-endotoxin nucleic acid molecules are provided. Additionally, amino acid sequences corresponding to the polynucleotides are encompassed, and antibodies specifically binding to those amino acid sequences. In particular, the present invention provides for isolated nucleic acid molecules having nucleotide sequences encoding the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 7, or 10, or the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, or 15, as well as variants and fragments thereof.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser.No. 61/139,947, filed Dec. 22, 2008, the contents of which are hereinincorporated by reference in their entirety.

REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING SUBMITTED AS A TEXT FILE VIA EFS-WEB

The official copy of the sequence listing is submitted concurrently withthe specification as an ASCII formatted text file via EFS-Web, with afile name of “383055_SequenceListing.txt”, a creation date of Dec. 16,2009, and a size of 98 kilobytes. The sequence listing filed via EFS-Webis part of the specification and is hereby incorporated in its entiretyby reference herein.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the field of molecular biology. Provided arenovel genes that encode insecticidal proteins. These proteins and thenucleic acid sequences that encode them are useful in preparinginsecticidal formulations and in the production of transgenicinsect-resistant plants.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Brevibacillus is a spore-forming bacterium that has been suggested forprobiotic effects. For example, Brevibacillus brevis is now wellestablished as a biocontrol agent in many areas, and has been shown tohave efficacy against Botrytis and powdery mildew disease (Edwards andSeddon, Edwards and Seddon (1992) Recent Advances in Botrytis Research.The Netherlands: Pudoc Scientific Publications; Bacillus brevis as aBiocontrol Agent against Botrytis cinerea on Protected Chinese Cabbage;pp. 267-271) and Fusarum head blight (FHB) (Zhang et al. (2005) JZhejiang Univ Sci B. 6(8):770-777). By comparing the activity of B.brevis Nagano against Botrytis cinerea with that of pure gramicidin Sand the antibiotic-negative mutant B. brevis E-1, Edwards and Seddon((2001) J Appl Microbiol. 91:652-659) showed that the mode of antagonismexhibited was antibiosis due to the presence of gramicidin S. There aresome other antibiotics (for example tyrocidins and gramicidin D)reported to be produced by B. brevis (Saito et al., 1970, Adv Enzymol.33:337-380).

Brevibacillus laterosporus comb. nov. (Shida (1996) Int. J. Syst.Bacteriol. 46:939-946), previously classified as Bacillus laterosporus,is an aerobic spore-forming bacterium that can also demonstratepathogenicity to insects. In common with B. sphaericus and B.thuringiensis, B. laterosporus produces parasporal bodies, which in thisspecies may be canoe-shaped and which serve to cradle the spore (Hanney(1957) J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 3:1001-1010) or can even be presentin different shapes (Smirnova et al. (1996) Res. Microbiol.147:343-350). However, these parasporal bodies were not considered tohave any entomocidal activity (Favret and Yousten (1985) J. Invertebr.Pathol. 45:195-203) until Orlova et al. ((1998) Appl. Environ.Microbiol. 64:2723-2725) demonstrated that some crystals produced duringsporulation are highly toxic to Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensilarvae.

Some B. laterosporus strains show no apparent toxic activity to any testorganism, and the observed toxicity is not homogeneous among toxicisolates (Favret and Yousten (1985) J. Invertebr. Pathol. 45:195-203,Rivers et al. (1991) J. Invertbr. Pathol. 58:444-447, and Singer (1996)Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 42:219-261). The results of the first bioassayswith B. laterosporus demonstrated that some strains presented alarvacidal activity which was 1,000 times lower than that of the B.thuringiensis var. israelensis standard (Favret and Yousten (1985),Rivers et al. (1991)). These results discouraged the use of B.laterosporus in biological control. No entomocidal activity has beendemonstrated against plant pathogens using isolates of Brevibacillus sp.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

Compositions and methods for conferring insect resistance to bacteria,plants, plant cells, tissues and seeds are provided. Compositionsinclude nucleic acid molecules encoding sequences forBrevibacillus-derived delta-endotoxin polypeptides, vectors comprisingthose nucleic acid molecules, and host cells comprising the vectors.Compositions also include the polypeptide sequences of the endotoxin,and antibodies to those polypeptides. The nucleotide sequences can beused in DNA constructs or expression cassettes for transformation andexpression in organisms, including microorganisms and plants. Thenucleotide or amino acid sequences may be synthetic sequences that havebeen designed for expression in an organism including, but not limitedto, a microorganism or a plant. Compositions also comprise transformedbacteria, plants, plant cells, tissues, and seeds.

In particular, isolated nucleic acid molecules corresponding todelta-endotoxin nucleic acid sequences are provided. Additionally, aminoacid sequences corresponding to the polynucleotides are encompassed. Inparticular, the present invention provides for an isolated nucleic acidmolecule comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding the amino acidsequence shown in any of SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 7, or 10, or a nucleotidesequence set forth in any of SEQ ID NO:1, 3, 5, 6, 8, or 9, as well asvariants and fragments thereof. Nucleotide sequences that arecomplementary to a nucleotide sequence of the invention, or thathybridize to a sequence of the invention are also encompassed.

The compositions and methods of the invention are useful for theproduction of organisms with resistance to plant pests, specificallybacteria and plants with resistance to these pests. These organisms andcompositions derived from them are desirable for agricultural purposes.The compositions of the invention are also useful for generating alteredor improved delta-endotoxin proteins that have pesticidal activity, orfor detecting the presence of delta-endotoxin proteins or nucleic acidsin products or organisms.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention is drawn to compositions and methods forregulating insect resistance in organisms, particularly plants or plantcells. The methods involve transforming organisms with a nucleotidesequence encoding a delta-endotoxin protein of the invention. Inparticular, the nucleotide sequences of the invention are useful forpreparing plants and microorganisms that possess insecticidal activity.Thus, transformed bacteria, plants, plant cells, plant tissues and seedsare provided. Compositions are delta-endotoxin nucleic acids andproteins derived from a Brevibacillus organism. By “derived from” isintended that the nucleic acid or polypeptide is cloned or otherwiseisolated from a Brevibacillus organism, or is a sequence that has beencloned or otherwise isolated from the Brevibacillus organism andsubsequently altered (e.g., by making nucleotide and/or amino acidchanges). The sequences find use in the construction of expressionvectors for subsequent transformation into organisms of interest, asprobes for the isolation of other delta-endotoxin genes, and for thegeneration of altered insecticidal proteins by methods known in the art,such as domain swapping or DNA shuffling. The proteins find use incontrolling or killing lepidopteran, coleopteran, nematode, and otherinsect populations that are pathogenic to plants, and for producingcompositions with insecticidal activity.

Exemplary Brevibacillus organisms from which the delta-endotoxinsequences encompassed by the present invention can be derived includeBrevibacillus agri, Brevibacillus borstelensis, Brevibacillus brevis,Brevibacillus centrosporus, Brevibacillus choshinensis, Brevibacillusformosus, Brevibacillus ginsengisoli, Brevibacillus invocatus,Brevibacillus laterosporus, Bacillus laterosporus, Brevibacilluslevickii, Brevibacillus limnophilus, Brevibacillus parabrevis,Brevibacillus reuszeri, Brevibacillus sp., and Brevibacillusthermoruber.

For the purposes of the present invention, a “Brevibacillus-deriveddelta-endotoxin” is intended a toxin from Brevibacillus sp. that hastoxic activity against one or more pests, including, but not limited to,members of the Lepidoptera and Coleoptera orders, or a protein that hashomology to such a protein. Delta-endotoxin proteins have been isolatedfrom other organisms, including Bacillus thuringiensis, Clostridiumbifermentans and Paenibacillus popilliae. However, prior to the presentinvention, these sequences were not known to exist in Brevibacillusorganisms. Thus, the present invention provides a new source foridentifying and isolating genes of agricultural significance.

Delta-endotoxin proteins include amino acid sequences deduced from thefull-length nucleotide sequences disclosed herein, and amino acidsequences that are shorter than the full-length sequences, either due tothe use of an alternate downstream start site, or due to processing thatproduces a shorter protein having insecticidal activity. Processing mayoccur in the organism the protein is expressed in, or in the pest afteringestion of the protein.

Further encompassed herein are any delta-endotoxin sequence derived froma Brevibacillus organism. Delta-endotoxins include proteins identifiedas cry1 through cry43, cyt1 and cyt2, and Cyt-like toxin. There arecurrently over 250 known species of delta-endotoxins with a wide rangeof specificities and toxicities. For an expansive list see Crickmore etal. (1998), Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:807-813, and for regularupdates see Crickmore et al. (2003) “Bacillus thuringiensis toxinnomenclature,” at www.biols.susx.ac.uk/Home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/index.

Provided herein are novel isolated nucleotide sequences that conferpesticidal activity against plant-pathogenic pests. Also provided arethe amino acid sequences of the delta-endotoxin proteins. The proteinresulting from translation of this gene allows cells to control or killinsects that ingest it.

Isolated Nucleic Acid Molecules, and Variants and Fragments Thereof

One aspect of the invention pertains to isolated or recombinant nucleicacid molecules comprising nucleotide sequences encoding delta-endotoxinproteins and polypeptides or biologically active portions thereof, aswell as nucleic acid molecules sufficient for use as hybridizationprobes to identify delta-endotoxin encoding nucleic acids. As usedherein, the term “nucleic acid molecule” is intended to include DNAmolecules (e.g., recombinant DNA, cDNA or genomic DNA) and RNA molecules(e.g., mRNA) and analogs of the DNA or RNA generated using nucleotideanalogs. The nucleic acid molecule can be single-stranded ordouble-stranded, but preferably is double-stranded DNA.

An “isolated” nucleic acid sequence (or DNA) is used herein to refer toa nucleic acid sequence (or DNA) that is no longer in its naturalenvironment, for example in an in vitro or in a recombinant bacterial orplant host cell. In some embodiments, an “isolated” nucleic acid is freeof sequences (preferably protein encoding sequences) that naturallyflank the nucleic acid (i.e., sequences located at the 5′ and 3′ ends ofthe nucleic acid) in the genomic DNA of the organism from which thenucleic acid is derived. For purposes of the invention, “isolated” whenused to refer to nucleic acid molecules excludes isolated chromosomes.For example, in various embodiments, the isolated delta-endotoxinencoding nucleic acid molecule can contain less than about 5 kb, 4 kb, 3kb, 2 kb, 1 kb, 0.5 kb, or 0.1 kb of nucleotide sequences that naturallyflank the nucleic acid molecule in genomic DNA of the cell from whichthe nucleic acid is derived. In various embodiments, a delta-endotoxinprotein that is substantially free of cellular material includespreparations of protein having less than about 30%, 20%, 10%, or 5% (bydry weight) of non-delta-endotoxin protein (also referred to herein as a“contaminating protein”).

Nucleotide sequences encoding the proteins of the present inventioninclude any delta-endotoxin derived from Brevibacillus. In variousembodiments, the delta-endotoxin nucleotide sequence comprises thesequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:3, 6, or 9, and variants, fragments, andcomplements thereof. In some embodiments, the nucleotide sequencecomprising SEQ ID NO:3, 6, or 9 is set forth in SEQ ID NO:1, 5, 8, 11,12, 13, 14, or 15. In other embodiments, the variants and fragments ofSEQ ID NO:3, 6, or 9 include the sequences corresponding to nucleotides160-3819 of SEQ ID NO:1, nucleotides 4-1059 of SEQ ID NO:6, nucleotides13-1059 of SEQ ID NO:6, nucleotides 151-1059 of SEQ ID NO:6, nucleotides19-1893 of SEQ ID NO:9, nucleotides 46-1893 of SEQ ID NO:9, andnucleotides 52-1893 of SEQ ID NO:9, as well as variants and fragments ofthose sequences.

By “complement” is intended a nucleotide sequence that is sufficientlycomplementary to a given nucleotide sequence such that it can hybridizeto the given nucleotide sequence to thereby form a stable duplex. Thecorresponding amino acid sequence for the delta-endotoxin proteinencoded by this nucleotide sequence are set forth in SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 7,and 10.

Nucleic acid molecules that are fragments of these delta-endotoxinencoding nucleotide sequences are also encompassed by the presentinvention. By “fragment” is intended a portion of the nucleotidesequence encoding a delta-endotoxin protein. A fragment of a nucleotidesequence may encode a biologically active portion of a delta-endotoxinprotein, or it may be a fragment that can be used as a hybridizationprobe or PCR primer using methods disclosed below. Nucleic acidmolecules that are fragments of a delta-endotoxin nucleotide sequencecomprise at least about 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900,1000, 1050, 1100, 1150, 1200, 1250, 1300, 1350, 1400, 1450, 1500, 1550,1600, 1650, 1700, 1750, 1800, 1850, 1900, 1950, 2000, 2050, 2100, 2150,2200, 2250, 2300, 2350, 2400, 2450, 2500, 2550, 2600, 2650, 2700, 2750,2800, 2850, 2900, 2950, 3000, 3050, 3100, 3150, 3200, 3250, 3300, 3350contiguous nucleotides, or up to the number of nucleotides present in afull-length delta-endotoxin encoding nucleotide sequence disclosedherein depending upon the intended use. By “contiguous” nucleotides isintended nucleotide residues that are immediately adjacent to oneanother. Fragments of the nucleotide sequences of the present inventionwill encode protein fragments that retain the biological activity of thedelta-endotoxin protein and, hence, retain insecticidal activity. By“retains activity” is intended that the fragment will have at leastabout 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 70%, 80%, 90%, 95% orhigher of the insecticidal activity of the delta-endotoxin protein.Methods for measuring insecticidal activity are well known in the art.See, for example, Czapla and Lang (1990) J. Econ. Entomol. 83:2480-2485;Andrews et al. (1988) Biochem. J. 252:199-206; Marrone et al. (1985) J.of Economic Entomology 78:290-293; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,477, all ofwhich are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

A fragment of a delta-endotoxin encoding nucleotide sequence thatencodes a biologically active portion of a protein of the invention willencode at least about 15, 25, 30, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 250,300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950,1000, 1050, 1100 contiguous amino acids, or up to the total number ofamino acids present in a full-length delta-endotoxin protein of theinvention.

Preferred delta-endotoxin proteins of the present invention are encodedby a nucleotide sequence sufficiently identical to any of the nucleotidesequences disclosed herein. By “sufficiently identical” is intended anamino acid or nucleotide sequence that has at least about 60% or 65%sequence identity, about 70% or 75% sequence identity, about 80% or 85%sequence identity, about 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%,99% or greater sequence identity compared to a reference sequence usingone of the alignment programs described herein using standardparameters. One of skill in the art will recognize that these values canbe appropriately adjusted to determine corresponding identity ofproteins encoded by two nucleotide sequences by taking into accountcodon degeneracy, amino acid similarity, reading frame positioning, andthe like.

To determine the percent identity of two amino acid sequences or of twonucleic acids, the sequences are aligned for optimal comparisonpurposes. The percent identity between the two sequences is a functionof the number of identical positions shared by the sequences (i.e.,percent identity=number of identical positions/total number of positions(e.g., overlapping positions)×100). In one embodiment, the two sequencesare the same length. In another embodiment, the comparison is across theentirety of the reference sequence (e.g., across the entirety of one ofSEQ ID NO:1-11). The percent identity between two sequences can bedetermined using techniques similar to those described below, with orwithout allowing gaps. In calculating percent identity, typically exactmatches are counted.

The determination of percent identity between two sequences can beaccomplished using a mathematical algorithm. A nonlimiting example of amathematical algorithm utilized for the comparison of two sequences isthe algorithm of Karlin and Altschul (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA87:2264, modified as in Karlin and Altschul (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA 90:5873-5877. Such an algorithm is incorporated into the BLASTNand BLASTX programs of Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215:403.BLAST nucleotide searches can be performed with the BLASTN program,score=100, wordlength=12, to obtain nucleotide sequences homologous todelta-endotoxin-like nucleic acid molecules of the invention. BLASTprotein searches can be performed with the BLASTX program, score=50,wordlength=3, to obtain amino acid sequences homologous todelta-endotoxin protein molecules of the invention. To obtain gappedalignments for comparison purposes, Gapped BLAST (in BLAST 2.0) can beutilized as described in Altschul et al. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res.25:3389. Alternatively, PSI-Blast can be used to perform an iteratedsearch that detects distant relationships between molecules. SeeAltschul et al. (1997) supra. When utilizing BLAST, Gapped BLAST, andPSI-Blast programs, the default parameters of the respective programs(e.g., BLASTX and BLASTN) can be used. Alignment may also be performedmanually by inspection.

Another non-limiting example of a mathematical algorithm utilized forthe comparison of sequences is the ClustalW algorithm (Higgins et al.(1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680). ClustalW compares sequences andaligns the entirety of the amino acid or DNA sequence, and thus canprovide data about the sequence conservation of the entire amino acidsequence. The ClustalW algorithm is used in several commerciallyavailable DNA/amino acid analysis software packages, such as the ALIGNXmodule of the Vector NTI Program Suite (Invitrogen Corporation,Carlsbad, Calif.). After alignment of amino acid sequences withClustalW, the percent amino acid identity can be assessed. Anon-limiting example of a software program useful for analysis ofClustalW alignments is GENEDOC™. GENEDOC™ (Karl Nicholas) allowsassessment of amino acid (or DNA) similarity and identity betweenmultiple proteins. Another non-limiting example of a mathematicalalgorithm utilized for the comparison of sequences is the algorithm ofMyers and Miller (1988) CABIOS 4:11-17. Such an algorithm isincorporated into the ALIGN program (version 2.0), which is part of theGCG Wisconsin Genetics Software Package, Version 10 (available fromAccelrys, Inc., 9685 Scranton Rd., San Diego, Calif., USA). Whenutilizing the ALIGN program for comparing amino acid sequences, a PAM120weight residue table, a gap length penalty of 12, and a gap penalty of 4can be used.

Unless otherwise stated, GAP Version 10, which uses the algorithm ofNeedleman and Wunsch (1970) J. Mol. Biol. 48(3):443-453, will be used todetermine sequence identity or similarity using the followingparameters: % identity and % similarity for a nucleotide sequence usingGAP Weight of 50 and Length Weight of 3, and the nwsgapdna.cmp scoringmatrix; % identity or % similarity for an amino acid sequence using GAPweight of 8 and length weight of 2, and the BLOSUM62 scoring program.Equivalent programs may also be used. By “equivalent program” isintended any sequence comparison program that, for any two sequences inquestion, generates an alignment having identical nucleotide residuematches and an identical percent sequence identity when compared to thecorresponding alignment generated by GAP Version 10.

The invention also encompasses variant nucleic acid molecules.“Variants” of the delta-endotoxin encoding nucleotide sequences includethose sequences that encode the delta-endotoxin proteins disclosedherein but that differ conservatively because of the degeneracy of thegenetic code as well as those that are sufficiently identical asdiscussed above. Naturally occurring allelic variants can be identifiedwith the use of well-known molecular biology techniques, such aspolymerase chain reaction (PCR) and hybridization techniques as outlinedbelow. Variant nucleotide sequences also include synthetically derivednucleotide sequences that have been generated, for example, by usingsite-directed mutagenesis but which still encode the delta-endotoxinproteins disclosed in the present invention as discussed below. Variantproteins encompassed by the present invention are biologically active,that is they continue to possess the desired biological activity of thenative protein, that is, retaining insecticidal activity. By “retainsactivity” is intended that the variant will have at least about 30%, atleast about 50%, at least about 70%, or at least about 80% of theinsecticidal activity of the native protein. Methods for measuringinsecticidal activity are well known in the art. See, for example,Czapla and Lang (1990) J. Econ. Entomol. 83: 2480-2485; Andrews et al.(1988) Biochem. J. 252:199-206; Marrone et al. (1985) J. of EconomicEntomology 78:290-293; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,477, all of which areherein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

The skilled artisan will further appreciate that changes can beintroduced by mutation of the nucleotide sequences of the inventionthereby leading to changes in the amino acid sequence of the encodeddelta-endotoxin proteins, without altering the biological activity ofthe proteins. Thus, variant isolated nucleic acid molecules can becreated by introducing one or more nucleotide substitutions, additions,or deletions into the corresponding nucleotide sequence disclosedherein, such that one or more amino acid substitutions, additions ordeletions are introduced into the encoded protein. Mutations can beintroduced by standard techniques, such as site-directed mutagenesis andPCR-mediated mutagenesis. Such variant nucleotide sequences are alsoencompassed by the present invention.

For example, conservative amino acid substitutions may be made at one ormore predicted, nonessential amino acid residues. A “nonessential” aminoacid residue is a residue that can be altered from the wild-typesequence of a delta-endotoxin protein without altering the biologicalactivity, whereas an “essential” amino acid residue is required forbiological activity. A “conservative amino acid substitution” is one inwhich the amino acid residue is replaced with an amino acid residuehaving a similar side chain. Families of amino acid residues havingsimilar side chains have been defined in the art. These families includeamino acids with basic side chains (e.g., lysine, arginine, histidine),acidic side chains (e.g., aspartic acid, glutamic acid), uncharged polarside chains (e.g., glycine, asparagine, glutamine, serine, threonine,tyrosine, cysteine), nonpolar side chains (e.g., alanine, valine,leucine, isoleucine, proline, phenylalanine, methionine, tryptophan),beta-branched side chains (e.g., threonine, valine, isoleucine) andaromatic side chains (e.g., tyrosine, phenylalanine, tryptophan,histidine).

Delta-endotoxins generally have five conserved sequence domains, andthree conserved structural domains (see, for example, de Maagd et al.(2001) Trends Genetics 17:193-199). The first conserved structuraldomain consists of seven alpha helices and is involved in membraneinsertion and pore formation. Domain II consists of three beta-sheetsarranged in a Greek key configuration, and domain III consists of twoantiparallel beta-sheets in “jelly-roll” formation (de Maagd et al.,2001, supra). Domains II and III are involved in receptor recognitionand binding, and are therefore considered determinants of toxinspecificity.

Amino acid substitutions may be made in nonconserved regions that retainfunction. In general, such substitutions would not be made for conservedamino acid residues, or for amino acid residues residing within aconserved motif, where such residues are essential for protein activity.Examples of residues that are conserved and that may be essential forprotein activity include, for example, residues that are identicalbetween all proteins contained in an alignment of the amino acidsequences of the present invention and known delta-endotoxin sequences.Examples of residues that are conserved but that may allow conservativeamino acid substitutions and still retain activity include, for example,residues that have only conservative substitutions between all proteinscontained in an alignment of the amino acid sequences of the presentinvention and known delta-endotoxin sequences. However, one of skill inthe art would understand that functional variants may have minorconserved or nonconserved alterations in the conserved residues.

Alternatively, variant nucleotide sequences can be made by introducingmutations randomly along all or part of the coding sequence, such as bysaturation mutagenesis, and the resultant mutants can be screened forability to confer delta-endotoxin activity to identify mutants thatretain activity. Following mutagenesis, the encoded protein can beexpressed recombinantly, and the activity of the protein can bedetermined using standard assay techniques.

Using methods such as PCR, hybridization, and the like correspondingdelta-endotoxin sequences can be identified, such sequences havingsubstantial identity to the sequences of the invention. See, forexample, Sambrook and Russell (2001) Molecular Cloning: A LaboratoryManual. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)and Innis, et al. (1990) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods andApplications (Academic Press, NY).

In a hybridization method, all or part of the delta-endotoxin nucleotidesequence can be used to screen cDNA or genomic libraries. Methods forconstruction of such cDNA and genomic libraries are generally known inthe art and are disclosed in Sambrook and Russell, 2001, supra. Theso-called hybridization probes may be genomic DNA fragments, cDNAfragments, RNA fragments, or other oligonucleotides, and may be labeledwith a detectable group such as ³²P, or any other detectable marker,such as other radioisotopes, a fluorescent compound, an enzyme, or anenzyme co-factor. Probes for hybridization can be made by labelingsynthetic oligonucleotides based on the known delta-endotoxin-encodingnucleotide sequence disclosed herein. Degenerate primers designed on thebasis of conserved nucleotides or amino acid residues in the nucleotidesequence or encoded amino acid sequence can additionally be used. Theprobe typically comprises a region of nucleotide sequence thathybridizes under stringent conditions to at least about 12, at leastabout 25, at least about 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 250, 300, 350,or 400 consecutive nucleotides of delta-endotoxin encoding nucleotidesequence of the invention or a fragment or variant thereof. Methods forthe preparation of probes for hybridization are generally known in theart and are disclosed in Sambrook and Russell, 2001, supra hereinincorporated by reference.

For example, an entire delta-endotoxin sequence disclosed herein, or oneor more portions thereof, may be used as a probe capable of specificallyhybridizing to corresponding delta-endotoxin-like sequences andmessenger RNAs. To achieve specific hybridization under a variety ofconditions, such probes include sequences that are unique and arepreferably at least about 10 nucleotides in length, or at least about 20nucleotides in length. Such probes may be used to amplify correspondingdelta-endotoxin sequences from a chosen organism by PCR. This techniquemay be used to isolate additional coding sequences from a desiredorganism or as a diagnostic assay to determine the presence of codingsequences in an organism. Hybridization techniques include hybridizationscreening of plated DNA libraries (either plaques or colonies; see, forexample, Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual(2d ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.).

Hybridization of such sequences may be carried out under stringentconditions. By “stringent conditions” or “stringent hybridizationconditions” is intended conditions under which a probe will hybridize toits target sequence to a detectably greater degree than to othersequences (e.g., at least 2-fold over background). Stringent conditionsare sequence-dependent and will be different in depending uponcircumstances. By controlling the stringency of the hybridization and/orwashing conditions, target sequences that are 100% complementary to theprobe can be identified (homologous probing). Alternatively, stringencyconditions can be adjusted to allow some mismatching in sequences sothat lower degrees of similarity are detected (heterologous probing).Generally, a probe is less than about 1000 nucleotides in length,preferably less than 500 nucleotides in length.

Typically, stringent conditions will be those in which the saltconcentration is less than about 1.5 M Na ion, typically about 0.01 to1.0 M Na ion concentration (or other salts) at pH 7.0 to 8.3 and thetemperature is at least about 30° C. for short probes (e.g., 10 to 50nucleotides) and at least about 60° C. for long probes (e.g., greaterthan 50 nucleotides). Stringent conditions may also be achieved with theaddition of destabilizing agents such as formamide. Exemplary lowstringency conditions include hybridization with a buffer solution of 30to 35% formamide, 1 M NaCl, 1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulphate) at 37° C.,and a wash in 1× to 2×SSC (20×SSC=3.0 M NaCl/0.3 M trisodium citrate) at50 to 55° C. Exemplary moderate stringency conditions includehybridization in 40 to 45% formamide, 1.0 M NaCl, 1% SDS at 37° C., anda wash in 0.5× to 1×SSC at 55 to 60° C. Exemplary high stringencyconditions include hybridization in 50% formamide, 1 M NaCl, 1% SDS at37° C., and a wash in 0.1×SSC at 60 to 65° C. Optionally, wash buffersmay comprise about 0.1% to about 1% SDS. Duration of hybridization isgenerally less than about 24 hours, usually about 4 to about 12 hours.

Specificity is typically the function of post-hybridization washes, thecritical factors being the ionic strength and temperature of the finalwash solution. For DNA-DNA hybrids, the T_(m) can be approximated fromthe equation of Meinkoth and Wahl (1984) Anal. Biochem. 138:267-284:T_(m)=81.5° C.+16.6(log M)+0.41(% GC)−0.61(% form)−500/L; where M is themolarity of monovalent cations, % GC is the percentage of guanosine andcytosine nucleotides in the DNA, % form is the percentage of formamidein the hybridization solution, and L is the length of the hybrid in basepairs. The T_(m) is the temperature (under defined ionic strength andpH) at which 50% of a complementary target sequence hybridizes to aperfectly matched probe. T_(m) is reduced by about 1° C. for each 1% ofmismatching; thus, T_(m), hybridization, and/or wash conditions can beadjusted to hybridize to sequences of the desired identity. For example,if sequences with ≧90% identity are sought, the T_(m) can be decreased10° C. Generally, stringent conditions are selected to be about 5° C.lower than the thermal melting point (T_(m)) for the specific sequenceand its complement at a defined ionic strength and pH. However, severelystringent conditions can utilize a hybridization and/or wash at 1, 2, 3,or 4° C. lower than the thermal melting point (T_(m)); moderatelystringent conditions can utilize a hybridization and/or wash at 6, 7, 8,9, or 10° C. lower than the thermal melting point (T_(m)); lowstringency conditions can utilize a hybridization and/or wash at 11, 12,13, 14, 15, or 20° C. lower than the thermal melting point (T_(m)).Using the equation, hybridization and wash compositions, and desiredT_(m), those of ordinary skill will understand that variations in thestringency of hybridization and/or wash solutions are inherentlydescribed. If the desired degree of mismatching results in a T_(m) ofless than 45° C. (aqueous solution) or 32° C. (formamide solution), itis preferred to increase the SSC concentration so that a highertemperature can be used. An extensive guide to the hybridization ofnucleic acids is found in Tijssen (1993) Laboratory Techniques inBiochemistry and Molecular Biology—Hybridization with Nucleic AcidProbes, Part I, Chapter 2 (Elsevier, New York); and Ausubel et al., eds.(1995) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Chapter 2 (GreenePublishing and Wiley-Interscience, New York). See Sambrook et al. (1989)Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2d ed., Cold Spring HarborLaboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.).

Isolated Proteins and Variants and Fragments Thereof

Delta-endotoxin proteins are also encompassed within the presentinvention. By “delta-endotoxin protein” is intended a protein having theamino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 7, or 10. Fragments,biologically active portions, and variants thereof are also provided,and may be used to practice the methods of the present invention. An“isolated protein” is used to refer to a protein that is no longer inits natural environment, for example in vitro or in a recombinantbacterial or plant host cell.

“Fragments” or “biologically active portions” include polypeptidefragments comprising amino acid sequences sufficiently identical to theamino acid sequence set forth in any of SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 7, or 10 andthat exhibit insecticidal activity. A biologically active portion of adelta-endotoxin protein can be a polypeptide that is, for example, 10,25, 50, 100 or more amino acids in length. Such biologically activeportions can be prepared by recombinant techniques and evaluated forinsecticidal activity. Methods for measuring insecticidal activity arewell known in the art. See, for example, Czapla and Lang (1990) J. Econ.Entomol. 83:2480-2485; Andrews et al. (1988) Biochem. J. 252:199-206;Marrone et al. (1985) J. of Economic Entomology 78:290-293; and U.S.Pat. No. 5,743,477, all of which are herein incorporated by reference intheir entirety. As used here, a fragment comprises at least 8 contiguousamino acids of SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 7, or 10. In various embodiments, thefragments correspond to amino acids 54-1272 of SEQ ID NO:2, amino acids21-651 of SEQ ID NO:4, amino acids 54-651 of SEQ ID NO:4, amino acids2-352 of SEQ ID NO:7, amino acids 5-352 of SEQ ID NO:7, amino acids51-352 of SEQ ID NO:7, amino acids 7-630 of SEQ ID NO:10, amino acids16-630 of SEQ ID NO:10, amino acids 18-630 of SEQ ID NO:10, as well asvariants and fragments thereof. The invention encompasses otherfragments, however, such as any fragment in the protein greater thanabout 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 400, 450, 500,550, 600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, 1050, 1100, 1150,1200, 1250, or 1300 amino acids.

By “variants” is intended proteins or polypeptides having an amino acidsequence that is at least about 60%, 65%, about 70%, 75%, about 80%,85%, about 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% identicalto the amino acid sequence of any of SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 7, or 10. Variantsalso include polypeptides encoded by a nucleic acid molecule thathybridizes to the nucleic acid molecule of SEQ ID NO:1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9,11, 12, 13, 14, or 15, or a complement thereof, under stringentconditions. Variants include polypeptides that differ in amino acidsequence due to mutagenesis. Variant proteins encompassed by the presentinvention are biologically active, that is they continue to possess thedesired biological activity of the native protein, that is, retaininginsecticidal activity. Methods for measuring insecticidal activity arewell known in the art. See, for example, Czapla and Lang (1990) J. Econ.Entomol. 83:2480-2485; Andrews et al. (1988) Biochem. J. 252:199-206;Marrone et al. (1985) J. of Economic Entomology 78:290-293; and U.S.Pat. No. 5,743,477, all of which are herein incorporated by reference intheir entirety.

Bacterial genes, such as the axmi genes of this invention, quite oftenpossess multiple methionine initiation codons in proximity to the startof the open reading frame. Often, translation initiation at one or moreof these start codons will lead to generation of a functional protein.These start codons can include ATG codons. However, bacteria such asBacillus sp. also recognize the codon GTG as a start codon, and proteinsthat initiate translation at GTG codons contain a methionine at thefirst amino acid. On rare occasions, translation in bacterial systemscan initiate at a TTG codon, though in this event the TTG encodes amethionine. Furthermore, it is not often determined a priori which ofthese codons are used naturally in the bacterium. Thus, it is understoodthat use of one of the alternate methionine codons may also lead togeneration of delta-endotoxin proteins that encode insecticidalactivity. These delta-endotoxin proteins are encompassed in the presentinvention and may be used in the methods of the present invention. Forexample, the amino acid sequences corresponding to amino acids 54-1272of SEQ ID NO:2, amino acids 21-651 of SEQ ID NO:4, amino acids 54-651 ofSEQ ID NO:4, amino acids 2-352 of SEQ ID NO:7, amino acids 5-352 of SEQID NO:7, amino acids 51-352 of SEQ ID NO:7, amino acids 7-630 of SEQ IDNO:10, amino acids 16-630 of SEQ ID NO:10, amino acids 18-630 of SEQ IDNO:10, as well as variants and fragments thereof are encompassed herein.It will be understood that, when expressed in plants, it will benecessary to alter the alternate start codon to ATG for propertranslation.

Antibodies to the polypeptides of the present invention, or to variantsor fragments thereof, are also encompassed. Methods for producingantibodies are well known in the art (see, for example, Harlow and Lane(1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory,Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,196,265).

Altered or Improved Variants

It is recognized that DNA sequences of a delta-endotoxin may be alteredby various methods, and that these alterations may result in DNAsequences encoding proteins with amino acid sequences different thanthat encoded by a delta-endotoxin of the present invention. This proteinmay be altered in various ways including amino acid substitutions,deletions, truncations, and insertions of one or more amino acids of SEQID NO:2, 4, 7, or 10, including up to about 2, about 3, about 4, about5, about 6, about 7, about 8, about 9, about 10, about 15, about 20,about 25, about 30, about 35, about 40, about 45, about 50, about 55,about 60, about 65, about 70, about 75, about 80, about 85, about 90,about 100, about 105, about 110, about 115, about 120, about 125, about130 or more amino acid substitutions, deletions or insertions.

Methods for such manipulations are generally known in the art. Forexample, amino acid sequence variants of a delta-endotoxin protein canbe prepared by mutations in the DNA. This may also be accomplished byone of several forms of mutagenesis and/or in directed evolution. Insome aspects, the changes encoded in the amino acid sequence will notsubstantially affect the function of the protein. Such variants willpossess the desired insecticidal activity. However, it is understoodthat the ability of a delta-endotoxin to confer insecticidal activitymay be improved by the use of such techniques upon the compositions ofthis invention. For example, one may express a delta-endotoxin in hostcells that exhibit high rates of base misincorporation during DNAreplication, such as XL-1 Red (Stratagene). After propagation in suchstrains, one can isolate the delta-endotoxin DNA (for example bypreparing plasmid DNA, or by amplifying by PCR and cloning the resultingPCR fragment into a vector), culture the delta-endotoxin mutations in anon-mutagenic strain, and identify mutated delta-endotoxin genes withinsecticidal activity, for example by performing an assay to test forinsecticidal activity. Generally, the protein is mixed and used infeeding assays. See, for example Marrone et al. (1985) J. of EconomicEntomology 78:290-293. Such assays can include contacting plants withone or more insects and determining the plant's ability to surviveand/or cause the death of the insects. Examples of mutations that resultin increased toxicity are found in Schnepf et al. (1998) Microbiol. Mol.Biol. Rev. 62:775-806.

Alternatively, alterations may be made to the protein sequence of manyproteins at the amino or carboxy terminus without substantiallyaffecting activity. This can include insertions, deletions, oralterations introduced by modern molecular methods, such as PCR,including PCR amplifications that alter or extend the protein codingsequence by virtue of inclusion of amino acid encoding sequences in theoligonucleotides utilized in the PCR amplification. Alternatively, theprotein sequences added can include entire protein-coding sequences,such as those used commonly in the art to generate protein fusions. Suchfusion proteins are often used to (1) increase expression of a proteinof interest (2) introduce a binding domain, enzymatic activity, orepitope to facilitate either protein purification, protein detection, orother experimental uses known in the art (3) target secretion ortranslation of a protein to a subcellular organelle, such as theperiplasmic space of Gram-negative bacteria, or the endoplasmicreticulum of eukaryotic cells, the latter of which often results inglycosylation of the protein.

Variant nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the present inventionalso encompass sequences derived from mutagenic and recombinogenicprocedures such as DNA shuffling. With such a procedure, one or moredifferent delta-endotoxin protein coding regions can be used to create anew delta-endotoxin protein possessing the desired properties. In thismanner, libraries of recombinant polynucleotides are generated from apopulation of related sequence polynucleotides comprising sequenceregions that have substantial sequence identity and can be homologouslyrecombined in vitro or in vivo. For example, using this approach,sequence motifs encoding a domain of interest may be shuffled between adelta-endotoxin gene of the invention and other known delta-endotoxingenes to obtain a new gene coding for a protein with an improvedproperty of interest, such as an increased insecticidal activity.Strategies for such DNA shuffling are known in the art. See, forexample, Stemmer (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:10747-10751;Stemmer (1994) Nature 370:389-391; Crameri et al. (1997) Nature Biotech.15:436-438; Moore et al. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 272:336-347; Zhang et al.(1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:4504-4509; Crameri et al. (1998)Nature 391:288-291; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,605,793 and 5,837,458.

Domain swapping or shuffling is another mechanism for generating altereddelta-endotoxin proteins. Domains II and III may be swapped betweendelta-endotoxin proteins, resulting in hybrid or chimeric toxins withimproved insecticidal activity or target spectrum. Methods forgenerating recombinant proteins and testing them for insecticidalactivity are well known in the art (see, for example, Naimov et al.(2001) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:5328-5330; de Maagd et al. (1996)Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:1537-1543; Ge et al. (1991) J. Biol. Chem.266:17954-17958; Schnepf et al. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265:20923-20930;Rang et al. 91999) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:2918-2925).

Vectors

A delta-endotoxin sequence of the invention may be provided in anexpression cassette for expression in a plant of interest. By “plantexpression cassette” is intended a DNA construct that is capable ofresulting in the expression of a protein from an open reading frame in aplant cell. Typically these contain a promoter and a coding sequence.Often, such constructs will also contain a 3′ untranslated region. Suchconstructs may contain a “signal sequence” or “leader sequence” tofacilitate co-translational or post-translational transport of thepeptide to certain intracellular structures such as the chloroplast (orother plastid), endoplasmic reticulum, or Golgi apparatus.

By “signal sequence” is intended a sequence that is known or suspectedto result in cotranslational or post-translational peptide transportacross the cell membrane. In eukaryotes, this typically involvessecretion into the Golgi apparatus, with some resulting glycosylation.By “leader sequence” is intended any sequence that when translated,results in an amino acid sequence sufficient to trigger co-translationaltransport of the peptide chain to a sub-cellular organelle. Thus, thisincludes leader sequences targeting transport and/or glycosylation bypassage into the endoplasmic reticulum, passage to vacuoles, plastidsincluding chloroplasts, mitochondria, and the like.

By “plant transformation vector” is intended a DNA molecule that isnecessary for efficient transformation of a plant cell. Such a moleculemay consist of one or more plant expression cassettes, and may beorganized into more than one “vector” DNA molecule. For example, binaryvectors are plant transformation vectors that utilize two non-contiguousDNA vectors to encode all requisite cis- and trans-acting functions fortransformation of plant cells (Hellens and Mullineaux (2000) Trends inPlant Science 5:446-451). “Vector” refers to a nucleic acid constructdesigned for transfer between different host cells. “Expression vector”refers to a vector that has the ability to incorporate, integrate andexpress heterologous DNA sequences or fragments in a foreign cell. Thecassette will include 5′ and 3′ regulatory sequences operably linked toa sequence of the invention. By “operably linked” is intended afunctional linkage between a promoter and a second sequence, wherein thepromoter sequence initiates and mediates transcription of the DNAsequence corresponding to the second sequence. Generally, operablylinked means that the nucleic acid sequences being linked are contiguousand, where necessary to join two protein coding regions, contiguous andin the same reading frame. The cassette may additionally contain atleast one additional gene to be cotransformed into the organism.Alternatively, the additional gene(s) can be provided on multipleexpression cassettes.

“Promoter” refers to a nucleic acid sequence that functions to directtranscription of a downstream coding sequence. The promoter togetherwith other transcriptional and translational regulatory nucleic acidsequences (also termed “control sequences”) are necessary for theexpression of a DNA sequence of interest.

Such an expression cassette is provided with a plurality of restrictionsites for insertion of the delta-endotoxin sequence to be under thetranscriptional regulation of the regulatory regions.

The expression cassette will include in the 5′-3′ direction oftranscription, a transcriptional and translational initiation region(i.e., a promoter), a DNA sequence of the invention, and a translationaland transcriptional termination region (i.e., termination region)functional in plants. The promoter may be native, or analogous, orforeign or heterologous, to the plant host and/or to the DNA sequence ofthe invention. Additionally, the promoter may be the natural sequence oralternatively a synthetic sequence. Where the promoter is “native” or“homologous” to the plant host, it is intended that the promoter isfound in the native plant into which the promoter is introduced. Wherethe promoter is “foreign” or “heterologous” to the DNA sequence of theinvention, it is intended that the promoter is not the native ornaturally occurring promoter for the operably linked DNA sequence of theinvention.

The termination region may be native with the transcriptional initiationregion, may be native with the operably linked DNA sequence of interest,may be native with the plant host, or may be derived from another source(i.e., foreign or heterologous to the promoter, the DNA sequence ofinterest, the plant host, or any combination thereof). Convenienttermination regions are available from the Ti-plasmid of A. tumefaciens,such as the octopine synthase and nopaline synthase termination regions.See also Guerineau et al. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 262:141-144; Proudfoot(1991) Cell 64:671-674; Sanfacon et al. (1991) Genes Dev. 5:141-149;Mogen et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2:1261-1272; Munroe et al. (1990) Gene91:151-158; Ballas et al. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17:7891-7903; andJoshi et al. (1987) Nucleic Acid Res. 15:9627-9639.

Where appropriate, the gene(s) may be optimized for increased expressionin the transformed host cell. That is, the genes can be synthesizedusing host cell-preferred codons for improved expression, or may besynthesized using codons at a host-preferred codon usage frequency.Generally, the GC content of the gene will be increased. See, forexample, Campbell and Gowri (1990) Plant Physiol. 92:1-11 for adiscussion of host-preferred codon usage. Methods are available in theart for synthesizing plant-preferred genes. See, for example, U.S. Pat.Nos. 5,380,831, and 5,436,391, and Murray et al. (1989) Nucleic AcidsRes. 17:477-498, herein incorporated by reference.

In one embodiment, the delta-endotoxin is targeted to the chloroplastfor expression. In this manner, where the delta-endotoxin is notdirectly inserted into the chloroplast, the expression cassette willadditionally contain a nucleic acid encoding a transit peptide to directthe delta-endotoxin to the chloroplasts. Such transit peptides are knownin the art. See, for example, Von Heijne et al. (1991) Plant Mol. Biol.Rep. 9:104-126; Clark et al. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264:17544-17550;Della-Cioppa et al. (1987) Plant Physiol. 84:965-968; Romer et al.(1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 196:1414-1421; and Shah et al.(1986) Science 233:478-481.

The delta-endotoxin gene to be targeted to the chloroplast may beoptimized for expression in the chloroplast to account for differencesin codon usage between the plant nucleus and this organelle. In thismanner, the nucleic acids of interest may be synthesized usingchloroplast-preferred codons. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,380,831,herein incorporated by reference.

Plant Transformation

Methods of the invention involve introducing a nucleotide construct intoa plant. By “introducing” is intended to present to the plant thenucleotide construct in such a manner that the construct gains access tothe interior of a cell of the plant. The methods of the invention do notrequire that a particular method for introducing a nucleotide constructto a plant is used, only that the nucleotide construct gains access tothe interior of at least one cell of the plant. Methods for introducingnucleotide constructs into plants are known in the art including, butnot limited to, stable transformation methods, transient transformationmethods, and virus-mediated methods.

By “plant” is intended whole plants, plant organs (e.g., leaves, stems,roots, etc.), seeds, plant cells, propagules, embryos and progeny of thesame. Plant cells can be differentiated or undifferentiated (e.g.callus, suspension culture cells, protoplasts, leaf cells, root cells,phloem cells, pollen).

“Transgenic plants” or “transformed plants” or “stably transformed”plants or cells or tissues refers to plants that have incorporated orintegrated exogenous nucleic acid sequences or DNA fragments into theplant cell. These nucleic acid sequences include those that areexogenous, or not present in the untransformed plant cell, as well asthose that may be endogenous, or present in the untransformed plantcell.

“Heterologous” generally refers to the nucleic acid sequences that arenot endogenous to the cell or part of the native genome in which theyare present, and have been added to the cell by infection, transfection,microinjection, electroporation, microprojection, or the like.

Transformation of plant cells can be accomplished by one of severaltechniques known in the art. The delta-endotoxin gene of the inventionmay be modified to obtain or enhance expression in plant cells.Typically a construct that expresses such a protein would contain apromoter to drive transcription of the gene, as well as a 3′untranslated region to allow transcription termination andpolyadenylation. The organization of such constructs is well known inthe art. In some instances, it may be useful to engineer the gene suchthat the resulting peptide is secreted, or otherwise targeted within theplant cell. For example, the gene can be engineered to contain a signalpeptide to facilitate transfer of the peptide to the endoplasmicreticulum. It may also be preferable to engineer the plant expressioncassette to contain an intron, such that mRNA processing of the intronis required for expression.

Typically this “plant expression cassette” will be inserted into a“plant transformation vector”. This plant transformation vector may becomprised of one or more DNA vectors needed for achieving planttransformation. For example, it is a common practice in the art toutilize plant transformation vectors that are comprised of more than onecontiguous DNA segment. These vectors are often referred to in the artas “binary vectors”. Binary vectors as well as vectors with helperplasmids are most often used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation,where the size and complexity of DNA segments needed to achieveefficient transformation is quite large, and it is advantageous toseparate functions onto separate DNA molecules. Binary vectors typicallycontain a plasmid vector that contains the cis-acting sequences requiredfor T-DNA transfer (such as left border and right border), a selectablemarker that is engineered to be capable of expression in a plant cell,and a “gene of interest” (a gene engineered to be capable of expressionin a plant cell for which generation of transgenic plants is desired).Also present on this plasmid vector are sequences required for bacterialreplication. The cis-acting sequences are arranged in a fashion to allowefficient transfer into plant cells and expression therein. For example,the selectable marker gene and the delta-endotoxin are located betweenthe left and right borders. Often a second plasmid vector contains thetrans-acting factors that mediate T-DNA transfer from Agrobacterium toplant cells. This plasmid often contains the virulence functions (Virgenes) that allow infection of plant cells by Agrobacterium, andtransfer of DNA by cleavage at border sequences and vir-mediated DNAtransfer, as is understood in the art (Hellens and Mullineaux (2000)Trends in Plant Science 5:446-451). Several types of Agrobacteriumstrains (e.g. LBA4404, GV3101, EHA101, EHA105, etc.) can be used forplant transformation. The second plasmid vector is not necessary fortransforming the plants by other methods such as microprojection,microinjection, electroporation, polyethylene glycol, etc.

In general, plant transformation methods involve transferringheterologous DNA into target plant cells (e.g. immature or matureembryos, suspension cultures, undifferentiated callus, protoplasts,etc.), followed by applying a maximum threshold level of appropriateselection (depending on the selectable marker gene) to recover thetransformed plant cells from a group of untransformed cell mass.Explants are typically transferred to a fresh supply of the same mediumand cultured routinely. Subsequently, the transformed cells aredifferentiated into shoots after placing on regeneration mediumsupplemented with a maximum threshold level of selecting agent. Theshoots are then transferred to a selective rooting medium for recoveringrooted shoot or plantlet. The transgenic plantlet then grows into amature plant and produces fertile seeds (e.g. Hiei et al. (1994) ThePlant Journal 6:271-282; Ishida et al. (1996) Nature Biotechnology14:745-750). Explants are typically transferred to a fresh supply of thesame medium and cultured routinely. A general description of thetechniques and methods for generating transgenic plants are found inAyres and Park (1994) Critical Reviews in Plant Science 13:219-239 andBommineni and Jauhar (1997) Maydica 42:107-120. Since the transformedmaterial contains many cells; both transformed and non-transformed cellsare present in any piece of subjected target callus or tissue or groupof cells. The ability to kill non-transformed cells and allowtransformed cells to proliferate results in transformed plant cultures.Often, the ability to remove non-transformed cells is a limitation torapid recovery of transformed plant cells and successful generation oftransgenic plants.

Transformation protocols as well as protocols for introducing nucleotidesequences into plants may vary depending on the type of plant or plantcell, i.e., monocot or dicot, targeted for transformation. Generation oftransgenic plants may be performed by one of several methods, including,but not limited to, microinjection, electroporation, direct genetransfer, introduction of heterologous DNA by Agrobacterium into plantcells (Agrobacterium-mediated transformation), bombardment of plantcells with heterologous foreign DNA adhered to particles, ballisticparticle acceleration, aerosol beam transformation (U.S. PublishedApplication No. 20010026941; U.S. Pat. No. 4,945,050; InternationalPublication No. WO 91/00915; U.S. Published Application No. 2002015066),Lec1 transformation, and various other non-particle direct-mediatedmethods to transfer DNA.

Methods for transformation of chloroplasts are known in the art. See,for example, Svab et al. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:8526-8530;Svab and Maliga (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:913-917; Svab andMaliga (1993) EMBO J. 12:601-606. The method relies on particle gundelivery of DNA containing a selectable marker and targeting of the DNAto the plastid genome through homologous recombination. Additionally,plastid transformation can be accomplished by transactivation of asilent plastid-borne transgene by tissue-preferred expression of anuclear-encoded and plastid-directed RNA polymerase. Such a system hasbeen reported in McBride et al. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA91:7301-7305.

Following integration of heterologous foreign DNA into plant cells, onethen applies a maximum threshold level of appropriate selection in themedium to kill the untransformed cells and separate and proliferate theputatively transformed cells that survive from this selection treatmentby transferring regularly to a fresh medium. By continuous passage andchallenge with appropriate selection, one identifies and proliferatesthe cells that are transformed with the plasmid vector. Molecular andbiochemical methods can then be used to confirm the presence of theintegrated heterologous gene of interest into the genome of thetransgenic plant.

The cells that have been transformed may be grown into plants inaccordance with conventional ways. See, for example, McCormick et al.(1986) Plant Cell Reports 5:81-84. These plants may then be grown, andeither pollinated with the same transformed strain or different strains,and the resulting hybrid having constitutive expression of the desiredphenotypic characteristic identified. Two or more generations may begrown to ensure that expression of the desired phenotypic characteristicis stably maintained and inherited and then seeds harvested to ensureexpression of the desired phenotypic characteristic has been achieved.In this manner, the present invention provides transformed seed (alsoreferred to as “transgenic seed”) having a nucleotide construct of theinvention, for example, an expression cassette of the invention, stablyincorporated into their genome.

Evaluation of Plant Transformation

Following introduction of heterologous foreign DNA into plant cells, thetransformation or integration of heterologous gene in the plant genomeis confirmed by various methods such as analysis of nucleic acids,proteins and metabolites associated with the integrated gene.

PCR analysis is a rapid method to screen transformed cells, tissue orshoots for the presence of incorporated gene at the earlier stage beforetransplanting into the soil (Sambrook and Russell (2001) MolecularCloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, ColdSpring Harbor, N.Y.). PCR is carried out using oligonucleotide primersspecific to the gene of interest or Agrobacterium vector background,etc.

Plant transformation may be confirmed by Southern blot analysis ofgenomic DNA (Sambrook and Russell, 2001, supra). In general, total DNAis extracted from the transformant, digested with appropriaterestriction enzymes, resolved in an agarose gel and transferred to anitrocellulose or nylon membrane. The membrane or “blot” is then probedwith, for example, radiolabeled ³²P target DNA fragment to confirm theintegration of introduced gene into the plant genome according tostandard techniques (Sambrook and Russell, 2001, supra).

In Northern blot analysis, RNA is isolated from specific tissues oftransformant, fractionated in a formaldehyde agarose gel, and blottedonto a nylon filter according to standard procedures that are routinelyused in the art (Sambrook and Russell, 2001, supra). Expression of RNAencoded by the delta-endotoxin is then tested by hybridizing the filterto a radioactive probe derived from a delta-endotoxin, by methods knownin the art (Sambrook and Russell, 2001, supra).

Western blot, biochemical assays and the like may be carried out on thetransgenic plants to confirm the presence of protein encoded by thedelta-endotoxin gene by standard procedures (Sambrook and Russell, 2001,supra) using antibodies that bind to one or more epitopes present on thedelta-endotoxin protein.

Insecticidal Activity in Plants

In another aspect of the invention, one may generate transgenic plantsexpressing a delta-endotoxin that has insecticidal activity. Methodsdescribed above by way of example may be utilized to generate transgenicplants, but the manner in which the transgenic plant cells are generatedis not critical to this invention. Methods known or described in the artsuch as Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, biolistic transformation,and non-particle-mediated methods may be used at the discretion of theexperimenter. Plants expressing a delta-endotoxin may be isolated bycommon methods described in the art, for example by transformation ofcallus, selection of transformed callus, and regeneration of fertileplants from such transgenic callus. In such process, one may use anygene as a selectable marker so long as its expression in plant cellsconfers ability to identify or select for transformed cells.

A number of markers have been developed for use with plant cells, suchas resistance to chloramphenicol, the aminoglycoside G418, hygromycin,or the like. Other genes that encode a product involved in chloroplastmetabolism may also be used as selectable markers. For example, genesthat provide resistance to plant herbicides such as glyphosate,bromoxynil, or imidazolinone may find particular use. Such genes havebeen reported (Stalker et al. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 263:6310-6314(bromoxynil resistance nitrilase gene); and Sathasivan et al. (1990)Nucl. Acids Res. 18:2188 (AHAS imidazolinone resistance gene).Additionally, the genes disclosed herein are useful as markers to assesstransformation of bacterial or plant cells. Methods for detecting thepresence of a transgene in a plant, plant organ (e.g., leaves, stems,roots, etc.), seed, plant cell, propagule, embryo or progeny of the sameare well known in the art. In one embodiment, the presence of thetransgene is detected by testing for insecticidal activity.

Fertile plants expressing a delta-endotoxin may be tested forinsecticidal activity, and the plants showing optimal activity selectedfor further breeding. Methods are available in the art to assay forinsect activity. Generally, the protein is mixed and used in feedingassays. See, for example Marrone et al. (1985) J. of Economic Entomology78:290-293.

The present invention may be used for transformation of any plantspecies, including, but not limited to, monocots and dicots. Examples ofplants of interest include, but are not limited to, corn (maize),sorghum, wheat, sunflower, tomato, crucifers, peppers, potato, cotton,rice, soybean, sugarbeet, sugarcane, tobacco, barley, and oilseed rape,Brassica sp., alfalfa, rye, millet, safflower, peanuts, sweet potato,cassava, coffee, coconut, pineapple, citrus trees, cocoa, tea, banana,avocado, fig, guava, mango, olive, papaya, cashew, macadamia, almond,oats, vegetables, ornamentals, and conifers.

Vegetables include, but are not limited to, tomatoes, lettuce, greenbeans, lima beans, peas, and members of the genus Cucumis such ascucumber, cantaloupe, and musk melon. Ornamentals include, but are notlimited to, azalea, hydrangea, hibiscus, roses, tulips, daffodils,petunias, carnation, poinsettia, and chrysanthemum. Preferably, plantsof the present invention are crop plants (for example, maize, sorghum,wheat, sunflower, tomato, crucifers, peppers, potato, cotton, rice,soybean, sugarbeet, sugarcane, tobacco, barley, oilseed rape, etc.).

Use in Insect Control

General methods for employing strains comprising a nucleotide sequenceof the present invention, or a variant thereof, in insect control or inengineering other organisms as insecticidal agents are known in the art.See, for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,039,523 and EP 0480762A2.

The Bacillus strains containing a nucleotide sequence of the presentinvention, or a variant thereof, or the microorganisms that have beengenetically altered to contain an insecticidal gene and protein may beused for protecting agricultural crops and products from insects. In oneaspect of the invention, whole, i.e., unlysed, cells of a toxin(insecticide)-producing organism are treated with reagents that prolongthe activity of the toxin produced in the cell when the cell is appliedto the environment of target insect(s).

Alternatively, the insecticide is produced by introducing adelta-endotoxin gene into a cellular host. Expression of thedelta-endotoxin gene results, directly or indirectly, in theintracellular production and maintenance of the insecticide. In oneaspect of this invention, these cells are then treated under conditionsthat prolong the activity of the toxin produced in the cell when thecell is applied to the environment of target insect(s). The resultingproduct retains the toxicity of the toxin. These naturally encapsulatedinsecticides may then be formulated in accordance with conventionaltechniques for application to the environment hosting a target insect,e.g., soil, water, and foliage of plants. See, for example EPA 0192319,and the references cited therein. Alternatively, one may formulate thecells expressing a gene of this invention such as to allow applicationof the resulting material as a insecticide.

Insecticidal Compositions

The active ingredients of the present invention are normally applied inthe form of compositions and can be applied to the crop area or plant tobe treated, simultaneously or in succession, with other compounds. Thesecompounds can be fertilizers, weed killers, cryoprotectants,surfactants, detergents, insecticidal soaps, dormant oils, polymers,and/or time-release or biodegradable carrier formulations that permitlong-term dosing of a target area following a single application of theformulation. They can also be selective herbicides, chemicalinsecticides, virucides, microbicides, amoebicides, pesticides,fungicides, bacteriocides, nematocides, molluscicides or mixtures ofseveral of these preparations, if desired, together with furtheragriculturally acceptable carriers, surfactants or application-promotingadjuvants customarily employed in the art of formulation. Suitablecarriers and adjuvants can be solid or liquid and correspond to thesubstances ordinarily employed in formulation technology, e.g. naturalor regenerated mineral substances, solvents, dispersants, wettingagents, tackifiers, binders or fertilizers. Likewise the formulationsmay be prepared into edible “baits” or fashioned into pest “traps” topermit feeding or ingestion by a target pest of the insecticidalformulation.

Methods of applying an active ingredient of the present invention or anagrochemical composition of the present invention that contains at leastone of the insecticidal proteins produced by the bacterial strains ofthe present invention include leaf application, seed coating and soilapplication. The number of applications and the rate of applicationdepend on the intensity of infestation by the corresponding insect.

The composition may be formulated as a powder, dust, pellet, granule,spray, emulsion, colloid, solution, or such like, and may be prepared bysuch conventional means as desiccation, lyophilization, homogenation,extraction, filtration, centrifugation, sedimentation, or concentrationof a culture of cells comprising the polypeptide. In all suchcompositions that contain at least one such insecticidal polypeptide,the polypeptide may be present in a concentration of from about 1% toabout 99% by weight.

Lepidopteran, coleopteran, or other insects may be killed or reduced innumbers in a given area by the methods of the invention, or may beprophylactically applied to an environmental area to prevent infestationby a susceptible insect. Preferably the insect ingests, or is contactedwith, a insecticidally-effective amount of the polypeptide. By“insecticidally-effective amount” is intended an amount of theinsecticide that is able to bring about death to at least one insect, orto noticeably reduce insect growth, feeding, or normal physiologicaldevelopment. This amount will vary depending on such factors as, forexample, the specific target insects to be controlled, the specificenvironment, location, plant, crop, or agricultural site to be treated,the environmental conditions, and the method, rate, concentration,stability, and quantity of application of the insecticidally-effectivepolypeptide composition. The formulations may also vary with respect toclimatic conditions, environmental considerations, and/or frequency ofapplication and/or severity of insect infestation.

The insecticide compositions described may be made by formulating eitherthe bacterial cell, crystal and/or spore suspension, or isolated proteincomponent with the desired agriculturally-acceptable carrier. Thecompositions may be formulated prior to administration in an appropriatemeans such as lyophilized, freeze-dried, desiccated, or in an aqueouscarrier, medium or suitable diluent, such as saline or other buffer. Theformulated compositions may be in the form of a dust or granularmaterial, or a suspension in oil (vegetable or mineral), or water oroil/water emulsions, or as a wettable powder, or in combination with anyother carrier material suitable for agricultural application. Suitableagricultural carriers can be solid or liquid and are well known in theart. The term “agriculturally-acceptable carrier” covers all adjuvants,inert components, dispersants, surfactants, tackifiers, binders, etc.that are ordinarily used in insecticide formulation technology; theseare well known to those skilled in insecticide formulation. Theformulations may be mixed with one or more solid or liquid adjuvants andprepared by various means, e.g., by homogeneously mixing, blendingand/or grinding the insecticidal composition with suitable adjuvantsusing conventional formulation techniques. Suitable formulations andapplication methods are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,468,523, hereinincorporated by reference.

“Pest” includes but is not limited to, insects, fungi, bacteria,nematodes, mites, ticks, and the like. Insect pests include insectsselected from the orders Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera,Mallophaga, Homoptera, Hemiptera, Orthroptera, Thysanoptera, Dermaptera,Isoptera, Anoplura, Siphonaptera , Trichoptera, etc., particularlyColeoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera. In various embodiments, the pestdoes not include Dipteran pests.

The order Coleoptera includes the suborders Adephaga and Polyphaga.Suborder Adephaga includes the superfamilies Caraboidea and Gyrinoidea,while suborder Polyphaga includes the superfamilies Hydrophiloidea,Staphylinoidea, Cantharoidea, Cleroidea, Elateroidea, Dascilloidea,Dryopoidea, Byrrhoidea, Cucujoidea, Meloidea, Mordelloidea,Tenebrionoidea, Bostrichoidea, Scarabaeoidea, Cerambycoidea,Chrysomeloidea, and Curculionoidea. Superfamily Caraboidea includes thefamilies Cicindelidae, Carabidae, and Dytiscidae. Superfamily Gyrinoideaincludes the family Gyrinidae. Superfamily Hydrophiloidea includes thefamily Hydrophilidae. Superfamily Staphylinoidea includes the familiesSilphidae and Staphylinidae. Superfamily Cantharoidea includes thefamilies Cantharidae and Lampyridae. Superfamily Cleroidea includes thefamilies Cleridae and Dermestidae. Superfamily Elateroidea includes thefamilies Elateridae and Buprestidae. Superfamily Cucujoidea includes thefamily Coccinellidae. Superfamily Meloidea includes the family Meloidae.Superfamily Tenebrionoidea includes the family Tenebrionidae.Superfamily Scarabaeoidea includes the families Passalidae andScarabaeidae. Superfamily Cerambycoidea includes the familyCerambycidae. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea includes the familyChrysomelidae. Superfamily Curculionoidea includes the familiesCurculionidae and Scolytidae.

The order Diptera includes the Suborders Nematocera, Brachycera, andCyclorrhapha. Suborder Nematocera includes the families Tipulidae,Psychodidae, Culicidae, Ceratopogonidae, Chironomidae, Simuliidae,Bibionidae, and Cecidomyiidae. Suborder Brachycera includes the familiesStratiomyidae, Tabanidae, Therevidae, Asilidae, Mydidae, Bombyliidae,and Dolichopodidae. Suborder Cyclorrhapha includes the Divisions Aschizaand Aschiza. Division Aschiza includes the families Phoridae, Syrphidae,and Conopidae. Division Aschiza includes the Sections Acalyptratae andCalyptratae. Section Acalyptratae includes the families Otitidae,Tephritidae, Agromyzidae, and Drosophilidae. Section Calyptrataeincludes the families Hippoboscidae, Oestridae, Tachinidae,Anthomyiidae, Muscidae, Calliphoridae, and Sarcophagidae.

The order Lepidoptera includes the families Papilionidae, Pieridae,Lycaenidae, Nymphalidae, Danaidae, Satyridae, Hesperiidae, Sphingidae,Saturniidae, Geometridae, Arctiidae, Noctuidae, Lymantriidae, Sesiidae,Crambidae, and Tineidae.

Nematodes include parasitic nematodes such as root-knot, cyst, andlesion nematodes, including Heterodera spp., Meloidogyne spp., andGlobodera spp.; particularly members of the cyst nematodes, including,but not limited to, Heterodera glycines (soybean cyst nematode);Heterodera schachtii (beet cyst nematode); Heterodera avenae (cerealcyst nematode); and Globodera rostochiensis and Globodera pailida(potato cyst nematodes). Lesion nematodes include Pratylenchus spp.

Insect pests of the invention for the major crops include: Maize:Ostrinia nubilalis, European corn borer; Agrotis ipsilon, black cutworm;Helicoverpa zea, corn earworm; Spodoptera frugiperda, fall armyworm;Diatraea grandiosella, southwestern corn borer; Elasmopalpuslignosellus, lesser cornstalk borer; Diatraea saccharalis, surgarcaneborer; Diabrotica virgifera, western corn rootworm; Diabroticalongicornis barberi, northern corn rootworm; Diabrotica undecimpunctatahowardi, southern corn rootworm; Melanotus spp., wireworms; Cyclocephalaborealis, northern masked chafer (white grub); Cyclocephala immaculata,southern masked chafer (white grub); Popillia japonica, Japanese beetle;Chaetocnema pulicaria, corn flea beetle; Sphenophorus maidis, maizebillbug; Rhopalosiphum maidis, corn leaf aphid; Anuraphis maidiradicis,corn root aphid; Blissus leucopterus leucopterus, chinch bug; Melanoplusfemurrubrum, redlegged grasshopper; Melanoplus sanguinipes, migratorygrasshopper; Hylemya platura, seedcorn maggot; Agromyza parvicornis,corn blot leafminer; Anaphothrips obscrurus, grass thrips; Solenopsismilesta, thief ant; Tetranychus urticae, twospotted spider mite;Sorghum: Chilo partellus, sorghum borer; Spodoptera frugiperda, fallarmyworm; Helicoverpa zea, corn earworm; Elasmopalpus lignosellus,lesser cornstalk borer; Feltia subterranea, granulate cutworm;Phyllophaga crinita, white grub; Eleodes, Conoderus, and Aeolus spp.,wireworms; Oulema melanopus, cereal leaf beetle; Chaetocnema pulicaria,corn flea beetle; Sphenophorus maidis, maize billbug; Rhopalosiphummaidis; corn leaf aphid; Sipha flava, yellow sugarcane aphid; Blissusleucopterus leucopterus, chinch bug; Contarinia sorghicola, sorghummidge; Tetranychus cinnabarinus, carmine spider mite; Tetranychusurticae, twospotted spider mite; Wheat: Pseudaletia unipunctata, armyworm; Spodoptera frugiperda, fall armyworm; Elasmopalpus lignosellus,lesser cornstalk borer; Agrotis orthogonia, western cutworm;Elasmopalpus lignosellus, lesser cornstalk borer; Oulema melanopus,cereal leaf beetle; Hypera punctata, clover leaf weevil; Diabroticaundecimpunctata howardi, southern corn rootworm; Russian wheat aphid;Schizaphis graminum, greenbug; Macrosiphum avenae, English grain aphid;Melanoplus femurrubrum, redlegged grasshopper; Melanoplusdifferentialis, differential grasshopper; Melanoplus sanguinipes,migratory grasshopper; Mayetiola destructor, Hessian fly; Sitodiplosismosellana, wheat midge; Meromyza americana, wheat stem maggot; Hylemyacoarctate, wheat bulb fly; Frankliniella fusca, tobacco thrips; Cephuscinctus, wheat stem sawfly; Aceria tulipae, wheat curl mite; Sunflower:Suleima helianthana, sunflower bud moth; Homoeosoma electellum,sunflower moth; zygogramma exclamationis, sunflower beetle; Bothyrusgibbosus, carrot beetle; Neolasioptera murtfeldtiana, sunflower seedmidge; Cotton: Heliothis virescens, cotton budworm; Helicoverpa zea,cotton bollworm; Spodoptera exigua, beet armyworm; Pectinophoragossypiella, pink bollworm; Anthonomus grandis, boll weevil; Aphisgossypii, cotton aphid; Pseudatomoscelis seriatus, cotton fleahopper;Trialeurodes abutilonea, bandedwinged whitefly; Lygus lineolaris,tarnished plant bug; Melanoplus femurrubrum, redlegged grasshopper;Melanoplus differentialis, differential grasshopper; Thrips tabaci,onion thrips; Franklinkiella fusca, tobacco thrips; Tetranychuscinnabarinus, carmine spider mite; Tetranychus urticae, twospottedspider mite; Rice: Diatraea saccharalis, sugarcane borer; Spodopterafrugiperda, fall armyworm; Helicoverpa zea, corn earworm; Colaspisbrunnea, grape colaspis; Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus, rice water weevil;Sitophilus oryzae, rice weevil; Nephotettix nigropictus, riceleafhopper; Blissus leucopterus leucopterus, chinch bug; Acrosternumhilare, green stink bug; Soybean: Pseudoplusia includens, soybeanlooper; Anticarsia gemmatalis, velvetbean caterpillar; Plathypenascabra, green cloverworm; Ostrinia nubilalis, European corn borer;Agrotis ipsilon, black cutworm; Spodoptera exigua, beet armyworm;Heliothis virescens, cotton budworm; Helicoverpa zea, cotton bollworm;Epilachna varivestis, Mexican bean beetle; Myzus persicae, green peachaphid; Empoasca fabae, potato leafhopper; Acrosternum hilare, greenstink bug; Melanoplus femurrubrum, redlegged grasshopper; Melanoplusdifferentialis, differential grasshopper; Hylemya platura, seedcornmaggot; Sericothrips variabilis, soybean thrips; Thrips tabaci, onionthrips; Tetranychus turkestani, strawberry spider mite; Tetranychusurticae, twospotted spider mite; Barley: Ostrinia nubilalis, Europeancorn borer; Agrotis ipsilon, black cutworm; Schizaphis graminum,greenbug; Blissus leucopterus leucopterus, chinch bug; Acrosternumhilare, green stink bug; Euschistus servus, brown stink bug; Deliaplatura, seedcorn maggot; Mayetiola destructor, Hessian fly; Petrobialatens, brown wheat mite; Oil Seed Rape: Brevicoryne brassicae, cabbageaphid; Phyllotreta cruciferae, Flea beetle; Mamestra configurata, Berthaarmyworm; Plutella xylostella, Diamond-back moth; Delia ssp., Rootmaggots.

Methods for Increasing Plant Yield

Methods for increasing plant yield are provided. The methods compriseintroducing into a plant or plant cell a polynucleotide comprising aninsecticidal sequence disclosed herein. As defined herein, the “yield”of the plant refers to the quality and/or quantity of biomass producedby the plant. By “biomass” is intended any measured plant product. Anincrease in biomass production is any improvement in the yield of themeasured plant product. Increasing plant yield has several commercialapplications. For example, increasing plant leaf biomass may increasethe yield of leafy vegetables for human or animal consumption.Additionally, increasing leaf biomass can be used to increase productionof plant-derived pharmaceutical or industrial products. An increase inyield can comprise any statistically significant increase including, butnot limited to, at least a 1% increase, at least a 3% increase, at leasta 5% increase, at least a 10% increase, at least a 20% increase, atleast a 30%, at least a 50%, at least a 70%, at least a 100% or agreater increase in yield compared to a plant not expressing theinsecticidal sequence.

In specific methods, plant yield is increased as a result of improvedinsect resistance of a plant expressing an insecticidal proteindisclosed herein. Expression of the insecticidal protein results in areduced ability of an insect to infest or feed on the plant, thusimproving plant yield.

The plants can also be treated with one or more chemical compositions,including one or more herbicide, insecticides, or fungicides. Exemplarychemical compositions include: Fruits/Vegetables Herbicides: Atrazine,Bromacil, Diuron, Glyphosate, Linuron, Metribuzin, Simazine,Trifluralin, Fluazifop, Glufosinate, Halosulfuron Gowan, Paraquat,Propyzamide, Sethoxydim, Butafenacil, Halosulfuron, Indaziflam;Fruits/Vegetables Insecticides: Aldicarb, Bacillus thuriengiensis,Carbaryl, Carbofuran, Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Deltamethrin,Diazinon, Malathion, Abamectin, Cyfluthrin/beta-cyfluthrin,Esfenvalerate, Lambda-cyhalothrin, Acequinocyl, Bifenazate,Methoxyfenozide, Novaluron, Chromafenozide, Thiacloprid, Dinotefuran,Fluacrypyrim, Tolfenpyrad, Clothianidin, Spirodiclofen,Gamma-cyhalothrin, Spiromesifen, Spinosad, Rynaxypyr, Cyazypyr,Spinoteram, Triflumuron, Spirotetramat, Imidacloprid, Flubendiamide,Thiodicarb, Metaflumizone, Sulfoxaflor, Cyflumetofen, Cyanopyrafen,Imidacloprid, Clothianidin, Thiamethoxam, Spinotoram, Thiodicarb,Flonicamid, Methiocarb, Emamectin-benzoate, Indoxacarb, Forthiazate,Fenamiphos, Cadusaphos, Pyriproxifen, Fenbutatin-oxid, Hexthiazox,Methomyl,4-[[(6-Chlorpyridin-3-yl)methyl](2,2-difluorethyl)amino]furan-2(5H)-on;Fruits/Vegetables Fungicides: Carbendazim, Chlorothalonil, EBDCs,Sulphur, Thiophanate-methyl, Azoxystrobin, Cymoxanil, Fluazinam,Fosetyl, Iprodione, Kresoxim-methyl, Metalaxyl/mefenoxam,Trifloxystrobin, Ethaboxam, Iprovalicarb, Trifloxystrobin, Fenhexamid,Oxpoconazole fumarate, Cyazofamid, Fenamidone, Zoxamide, Picoxystrobin,Pyraclostrobin, Cyflufenamid, Boscalid; Cereals Herbicides: Isoproturon,Bromoxynil, Ioxynil, Phenoxies, Chlorsulfuron, Clodinafop, Diclofop,Diflufenican, Fenoxaprop, Florasulam, Fluroxypyr, Metsulfuron,Triasulfuron, Flucarbazone, Iodosulfuron, Propoxycarbazone, Picolinafen,Mesosulfuron, Beflubutamid, Pinoxaden, Amidosulfuron, Thifensulfuron,Tribenuron, Flupyrsulfuron, Sulfosulfuron, Pyrasulfotole, Pyroxsulam,Flufenacet, Tralkoxydim, Pyroxasulfon; Cereals Fungicides: Carbendazim,Chlorothalonil, Azoxystrobin, Cyproconazole, Cyprodinil, Fenpropimorph,Epoxiconazole, Kresoxim-methyl, Quinoxyfen, Tebuconazole,Trifloxystrobin, Simeconazole, Picoxystrobin, Pyraclostrobin,Dimoxystrobin, Prothioconazole, Fluoxastrobin; Cereals Insecticides:Dimethoate, Lambda-cyhalthrin, Deltamethrin, alpha-Cypermethrin,β-cyfluthrin, Bifenthrin, Imidacloprid, Clothianidin, Thiamethoxam,Thiacloprid, Acetamiprid, Dinetofuran, Clorphyriphos, Metamidophos,Oxidemethon-methyl, Pirimicarb, Methiocarb; Maize Herbicides: Atrazine,Alachlor, Bromoxynil, Acetochlor, Dicamba, Clopyralid, (S-)Dimethenamid,Glufosinate, Glyphosate, Isoxaflutole, (S-)Metolachlor, Mesotrione,Nicosulfuron, Primisulfuron, Rimsulfuron, Sulcotrione, Foramsulfuron,Topramezone, Tembotrione, Saflufenacil, Thiencarbazone, Flufenacet,Pyroxasulfon; Maize Insecticides Carbofuran, Chlorpyrifos, Bifenthrin,Fipronil, Imidacloprid, Lambda-Cyhalothrin, Tefluthrin, Terbufos,Thiamethoxam, Clothianidin, Spiromesifen, Flubendiamide, Triflumuron,Rynaxypyr, Deltamethrin, Thiodicarb, β-Cyfluthrin, Cypermethrin,Bifenthrin, Lufenuron, Triflumoron, Tefluthrin, Tebupirimphos,Ethiprole, Cyazypyr, Thiacloprid, Acetamiprid, Dinetofuran, Avermectin,Methiocarb, Spirodiclofen, Spirotetramat; Maize Fungicides: Fenitropan,Thiram, Prothioconazole, Tebuconazole, Trifloxystrobin; Rice Herbicides:Butachlor, Propanil, Azimsulfuron, Bensulfuron, Cyhalofop, Daimuron,Fentrazamide, Imazosulfuron, Mefenacet, Oxaziclomefone, Pyrazosulfuron,Pyributicarb, Quinclorac, Thiobencarb, Indanofan, Flufenacet,Fentrazamide, Halosulfuron, Oxaziclomefone, Benzobicyclon, Pyriftalid,Penoxsulam, Bispyribac, Oxadiargyl, Ethoxysulfuron, Pretilachlor,Mesotrione, Tefuryltrione, Oxadiazone, Fenoxaprop, Pyrimisulfan; RiceInsecticides: Diazinon, Fenitrothion, Fenobucarb, Monocrotophos,Benfuracarb, Buprofezin, Dinotefuran, Fipronil, Imidacloprid,Isoprocarb, Thiacloprid, Chromafenozide, Thiacloprid, Dinotefuran,Clothianidin, Ethiprole, Flubendiamide, Rynaxypyr, Deltamethrin,Acetamiprid, Thiamethoxam, Cyazypyr, Spinosad, Spinotoram,Emamectin-Benzoate, Cypermethrin, Chlorpyriphos, Cartap, Methamidophos,Etofenprox, Triazophos,4-[[(6-Chlorpyridin-3-yl)methyl](2,2-difluorethyl)amino]furan-2(5H)-on,Carbofuran, Benfuracarb; Rice Fungicides: Thiophanate-methyl,Azoxystrobin, Carpropamid, Edifenphos, Ferimzone, Iprobenfos,Isoprothiolane, Pencycuron, Probenazole, Pyroquilon, Tricyclazole,Trifloxystrobin, Diclocymet, Fenoxanil, Simeconazole, Tiadinil; CottonHerbicides: Diuron, Fluometuron, MSMA, Oxyfluorfen, Prometryn,Trifluralin, Carfentrazone, Clethodim, Fluazifop-butyl, Glyphosate,Norflurazon, Pendimethalin, Pyrithiobac-sodium, Trifloxysulfuron,Tepraloxydim, Glufosinate, Flumioxazin, Thidiazuron; CottonInsecticides: Acephate, Aldicarb, Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin,Deltamethrin, Malathion, Monocrotophos, Abamectin, Acetamiprid,Emamectin Benzoate, Imidacloprid, Indoxacarb, Lambda-Cyhalothrin,Spinosad, Thiodicarb, Gamma-Cyhalothrin, Spiromesifen, Pyridalyl,Flonicamid, Flubendiamide, Triflumuron, Rynaxypyr, Beta-Cyfluthrin,Spirotetramat,

Clothianidin, Thiamethoxam, Thiacloprid, Dinetofuran, Flubendiamide,Cyazypyr, Spinosad, Spinotoram, gamma Cyhalothrin,4-[[(6-Chlorpyridin-3-yl)methyl](2,2-difluorethyl)amino]furan-2(5H)-on,Thiodicarb, Avermectin, Flonicamid, Pyridalyl, Spiromesifen,Sulfoxaflor, Profenophos, Thriazophos, Endosulfan; Cotton Fungicides:Etridiazole, Metalaxyl, Quintozene; Soybean Herbicides: Alachlor,Bentazone, Trifluralin, Chlorimuron-Ethyl, Cloransulam-Methyl,Fenoxaprop, Fomesafen, Fluazifop, Glyphosate, Imazamox, Imazaquin,Imazethapyr, (S-)Metolachlor, Metribuzin, Pendimethalin, Tepraloxydim,Glufosinate; Soybean Insecticides: Lambda-cyhalothrin, Methomyl,Parathion, Thiocarb, Imidacloprid, Clothianidin, Thiamethoxam,Thiacloprid, Acetamiprid, Dinetofuran, Flubendiamide, Rynaxypyr,Cyazypyr, Spinosad, Spinotoram, Emamectin-Benzoate, Fipronil, Ethiprole,Deltamethrin, β-Cyfluthrin, gamma and lambda Cyhalothrin,4-[[(6-Chlorpyridin-3-yl)methyl](2,2-difluorethyl)amino]furan-2(5H)-on,Spirotetramat, Spinodiclofen, Triflumuron, Flonicamid, Thiodicarb,beta-Cyfluthrin; Soybean Fungicides: Azoxystrobin, Cyproconazole,Epoxiconazole, Flutriafol, Pyraclostrobin, Tebuconazole,Trifloxystrobin, Prothioconazole, Tetraconazole; Sugarbeet Herbicides:Chloridazon, Desmedipham, Ethofumesate, Phenmedipham, Triallate,Clopyralid, Fluazifop, Lenacil, Metamitron, Quinmerac, Cycloxydim,Triflusulfuron, Tepraloxydim, Quizalofop; Sugarbeet Insecticides:Imidacloprid, Clothianidin, Thiamethoxam, Thiacloprid, Acetamiprid,Dinetofuran, Deltamethrin, β-Cyfluthrin, gamma/lambda Cyhalothrin,4-[[(6-Chlorpyridin-3-yl)methyl](2,2-difluorethyl)amino]furan-2(5H)-on,Tefluthrin, Rynaxypyr, Cyaxypyr, Fipronil, Carbofuran; CanolaHerbicides: Clopyralid, Diclofop, Fluazifop, Glufosinate, Glyphosate,Metazachlor, Trifluralin Ethametsulfuron, Quinmerac, Quizalofop,Clethodim, Tepraloxydim; Canola Fungicides: Azoxystrobin, Carbendazim,Fludioxonil, Iprodione, Prochloraz, Vinclozolin; Canola Insecticides:Carbofuran, Organophosphates, Pyrethroids, Thiacloprid, Deltamethrin,Imidacloprid, Clothianidin, Thiamethoxam, Acetamiprid, Dinetofuran,β-Cyfluthrin, gamma and lambda Cyhalothrin, tau-Fluvaleriate, Ethiprole,Spinosad, Spinotoram, Flubendiamide, Rynaxypyr, Cyazypyr,4-[[(6-Chlorpyridin-3-yl)methyl](2,2-difluorethyl)amino]furan-2(5H)-on.

The following examples are offered by way of illustration and not by wayof limitation.

EXPERIMENTAL Example 1 Identification of axmi-134 from BrevibacillusStrain ATX15530

The complete gene sequence was identified as follows:

Preparation of extrachromosomal DNA from the strain. ExtrachromosomalDNA contains a mixture of some or all of the following: plasmids ofvarious size; phage chromosomes; genomic DNA fragments not separated bythe purification protocol; other uncharacterized extrachromosomalmolecules.

Mechanical or enzymatic shearing of the extrachromosomal DNA to generatesize-distributed fragments.

Sequencing of the fragmented DNA by high-throughput pyrosequencingmethods. Identification of putative toxin genes via homology and/orother computational analyses.

When required, sequence finishing of the gene of interest by one ofseveral PCR or cloning strategies (e.g. TAIL-PCR).

The sequence of the axmi-134 open reading frame is provided herein asSEQ ID NO:1 and encodes the AXMI-134 protein (SEQ ID NO: 2. Comparisonof AXMI-134 vs protein databases identified the following homologies:

Known Homologs and Approximate Percent Identity: Cry43Aa1—60%Cry43Aa1—60% Cry43Ba1—55% Example 2 Heterologous Expression of AXMI-134

The complete ORF of axmi-134 (3.82 kb which encodes 1272 amino acid longprotein) was amplified from Brevibacillus strain ATX15530 usingappropriate primers. It was cloned into an E. coli expression vectorbased on pRSF1b (to give pAX5479) and a Bacillus vector based on pAX916(to give pAX5481). The resulting clones were confirmed by restrictionanalysis and finally, by complete sequencing of the cloned gene. Forexpression in E. coli, BL21*DE3 was transformed with pAX5479. Singlecolony was inoculated in LB supplemented with kanamycin and grownovernight at 37° C. The following day, fresh medium was inoculated induplicate with 1% of overnight culture and grown at 37° C. tologarithmic phase. Subsequently, cultures were induced with 1 mM IPTGfor 3 hours at 37° C. or overnight at 20° C. Each cell pellet wassuspended in 50 mM sodium carbonate buffer, pH 10.5 supplemented with 1mM DTT and sonicated. Analysis by SDS-PAGE detected expression of a 144kD protein corresponding to Axmi134. For expression in Bacillus, alaboratory strain of Bacillus was transformed with pAX5481 and a singlecolony was grown in CYS-glu medium for 3 days to sporulation. Cellpellet was then extracted with 50 mM sodium carbonate buffer, pH 10.5supplemented with 1 mM DTT. Soluble fraction showed presence of a ˜144kD Axmi134 protein. Trypsinization of Axmi134 cleaved the full lengthprotein, resulting in two protein fragments of about 85 kDa and 65 kDa.

Example 3 Pesticidal Activity of AXMI-134

Soluble extracts containing Axmi134 were tested separately in insectassays with appropriate controls at an approximate concentration of 200ng/ul. In this assay, a 5 day read of the plates showed AXMI-134 to havepesticidal activity on diamondback moth (DBM) and Colorado potato beetle(CPB) (see Table 2 below). Trypsin treatment of AXMI-134 resulted instrong mortality and stunting on DBM and CPB, (Table 2) respectively.Table 1 shows a description of the scoring assignments used herein

TABLE 1 Description of Scoring System Score Description 0 no effectobserved 1 mild non-uniform stunting 2 moderate non-uniform stunting 3moderate to severe uniform stunting 4 mortality (<100%) with uniformstunting 5 complete mortality

TABLE 2 Activity of AXMI134 on Diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella)and Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata). Pest AXMI134AXMI134 (Trypsin treated) Diamondback 4 -Uniform stunt, 4 - Uniformstunt, Moth 60% mortality 80% mortality Colorado 3 - Light feeding onleaf 5 - Little or no feeding on Potato Beetle disks, 100% mortalityleaf disks, 100% mortality

Example 4 N-Terminal Deletions of AXMI-134

A series of N-terminal deletions of AXMI-134 were planned and performedusing PCR-based cloning. The deletion mutants thus generated were clonedand expressed, and resulting protein products were tested for activityagainst selected agricultural pests. An ‘ATG’ start codon, encodingmethionine (M), was added at the beginning of each variant. Listed hereare the start sites of the deletion variants and their starting aminoacid sequences (corresponding to SEQ ID NO:2).

TABLE 3 Location of Protein start sites in N-terminal Deletions Startingposition Relative to Deletion SEQ ID NO: 2 D3 21 D5 39 D6 55 D7 63 D8 73D9 83 D11 103 D12 119

All deletion mutants were PCR amplified from construct pAX5481 (whichcontains the full-length axmi-134 gene) and cloned into the BamHI sitein the expression vector pAX916. All constructs were transformed intohost cells and grown to measure the expression of the truncatedvariants. Soluble protein was extracted in 50 mM sodium carbonatebuffer, pH 10.5. Whole culture (W) and soluble (S) fractions wereanalyzed by SDS-PAGE.

Deletions at the N-terminus had differing effects on the solubility ofAXMI-134. Variant D3, cloned into pAX4245 and starting at position 21 ofthe native AXMI-134 amino acid sequence, showed enhanced solubility asestimated by PAGE analysis. Variants D5, D6, D7, D8, D9, and D12expressed poorly and produced little or no soluble protein under theconditions tested. Variant D11 expressed and produced soluble protein atlevels comparable to the wild-type AXMI-134 protein.

Soluble fractions were assayed at three concentrations (100, 50, and 10ng per microliter) against Colorado Potato Beetle (CPB) using leaf-dipassays. Results are presented in Table 3. Scores are presented as meansof 3 replicate experiments, with individual component scores presentedparenthetically. The scoring key for Table 4 is the same as for Table 1above.

Variant D3 (cloned into pAX4245) showed enhanced activity versus thewild-type against CPB in replicate assays. The LC50 for variant D3 wasfound to be 52.5 ng/ml and the LC50 for the wild-type was found to be800 ng/ml for CPB. The remaining variants showed no activity in thisassay.

TABLE 4 Activity of Axmi134 variants against Colorado Potato Beetle Formof Axmi134 100 ng/ul 50 ng/ul 10 ng/ul Full length 2.33(2, 2, 3) 2.67(2,3, 3) 0 (pAX5481) Deleted form D3 4.67(5, 4, 5) 3.67(3, 4, 4) 2(2, 2, 2)(pAX4245)

N-terminal deletions may be of general utility in designing activevariants of Cry-type delta endotoxins. The N-terminal portion ofAXMI-134 contained multiple asparagine (N) and glutamine (Q) residues.Other Cry-type proteins have sequences near the N terminus that containsimilar polar residues. Removal of this portion of the protein mayfacilitate toxin activation.

Example 5 Identification of axmi-159 from Brevibacillus Strain ATX15530

The complete gene sequence was identified as follows:

Preparation of Extrachromosomal DNA from the Strain. ExtrachromosomalDNA contains a mixture of some or all of the following: plasmids ofvarious size; phage chromosomes; genomic DNA fragments not separated bythe purification protocol; other uncharacterized extrachromosomalmolecules.

Mechanical or enzymatic shearing of the extrachromosomal DNA to generatesize-distributed fragments.

Sequencing of the fragmented DNA by high-throughput pyrosequencingmethods. Identification of putative toxin genes via homology and/orother computational analyses.

When required, sequence finishing of the gene of interest by one ofseveral PCR or cloning strategies (e.g. TAIL-PCR).

The sequence of the axmi-159 open reading frame is provided herein asSEQ ID NO:6 and encodes the AXMI-159 protein (SEQ ID NO:7). Comparisonof AXMI-159 vs protein databases identified the following homologies:

AXMI-159 Homologs and Approximate Percent Identity: Axmi012—24.0%Cry35Ba1—21.1% Cry35Ac1—20.5% Example 6 Identification of axmi-160 fromBrevibacillus Strain ATX15530

The complete gene sequence was identified as follows:

Preparation of extrachromosomal DNA from the Strain. ExtrachromosomalDNA contains a mixture of some or all of the following: plasmids ofvarious size; phage chromosomes; genomic DNA fragments not separated bythe purification protocol; other uncharacterized extrachromosomalmolecules.

Mechanical or enzymatic shearing of the extrachromosomal DNA to generatesize-distributed fragments.

Sequencing of the fragmented DNA by high-throughput pyrosequencingmethods. Identification of putative toxin genes via homology and/orother computational analyses.

When required, sequence finishing of the gene of interest by one ofseveral PCR or cloning strategies (e.g. TAIL-PCR).

The sequence of the axmi-160 open reading frame is provided herein asSEQ ID NO:9 and encodes the AXMI-160 protein (SEQ ID NO:10). Comparisonof AXMI-160 vs protein databases identified the following homologies:

Known Homologs and Approximate Percent Identity:

lethal factor—20.5%

Vip2Ba1—20.7% Example 7 Synthetic Genes

Alternate DNA sequences encoding the proteins of the invention weredeveloped. They are provided as follows:

Encoded SEQ ID NO of Corresponding amino Protein Synthetic Gene acidencoded AXMI-134(v01) 12 amino acids 1-677 of SEQ ID NO: 2 AXMI-134(v02)13 amino acids 21-662 of SEQ ID NO: 2 with N- terminal methionineaddition AXMI-159 14 amino acids 1-352 of SEQ ID NO: 7 AXMI-160 15 aminoacids 1-630 of SEQ ID NO: 10

Example 8 Additional Assays for Pesticidal Activity

The ability of an insecticidal protein to act as a pesticide upon a pestis often assessed in a number of ways. One way well known in the art isto perform a feeding assay. In such a feeding assay, one exposes thepest to a sample containing either compounds to be tested, or controlsamples. Often this is performed by placing the material to be tested,or a suitable dilution of such material, onto a material that the pestwill ingest, such as an artificial diet. The material to be tested maybe in a liquid, solid, or slurry form. The material to be tested may beplaced upon the surface and then allowed to dry or incorporate into thediet. Alternatively, the material to be tested may be mixed with amolten artificial diet, then dispensed into the assay chamber. The assaychamber may be, for example, a cup, a dish, or a well of a microtiterplate.

Assays for sucking pests (for example aphids) may involve separating thetest material from the insect by a partition, ideally a portion that canbe pierced by the sucking mouth parts of the sucking insect, to allowingestion of the test material. Often the test material is mixed with afeeding stimulant, such as sucrose, to promote ingestion of the testcompound.

Other types of assays can include microinjection of the test materialinto the mouth, or gut of the pest, as well as development of transgenicplants, followed by test of the ability of the pest to feed upon thetransgenic plant. Plant testing may involve isolation of the plant partsnormally consumed, for example, small cages attached to a leaf, orisolation of entire plants in cages containing insects.

Other methods and approaches to assay pests are known in the art, andcan be found, for example in Robertson, J. L. & H. K. Preisler. 1992.Pesticide bioassays with arthropods. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.Alternatively, assays are commonly described in the journals “ArthropodManagement Tests” and “Journal of Economic Entomology” or by discussionwith members of the Entomological Society of America (ESA).

Example 9 Vectoring of the Insecticidal Genes of the Invention for PlantExpression

Each of the coding regions of the genes of the invention is connectedindependently with appropriate promoter and terminator sequences forexpression in plants. Such sequences are well known in the art and mayinclude the rice actin promoter or maize ubiquitin promoter forexpression in monocots, the Arabidopsis UBQ3 promoter or CaMV 35Spromoter for expression in dicots, and the nos or PinII terminators.Techniques for producing and confirming promoter-gene-terminatorconstructs also are well known in the art.

Example 10 Transformation of the Genes of the Invention into Plant Cellsby Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation

Ears are collected 8-12 days after pollination. Embryos are isolatedfrom the ears, and those embryos 0.8-1.5 mm in size are used fortransformation. Embryos are plated scutellum side-up on a suitableincubation media, and incubated overnight at 25° C. in the dark.However, it is not necessary per se to incubate the embryos overnight.Embryos are contacted with an Agrobacterium strain containing theappropriate vectors for Ti plasmid mediated transfer for 5-10 min, andthen plated onto co-cultivation media for 3 days (25° C. in the dark).After co-cultivation, explants are transferred to recovery period mediafor five days (at 25° C. in the dark). Explants are incubated inselection media for up to eight weeks, depending on the nature andcharacteristics of the particular selection utilized. After theselection period, the resulting callus is transferred to embryomaturation media, until the formation of mature somatic embryos isobserved. The resulting mature somatic embryos are then placed under lowlight, and the process of regeneration is initiated as known in the art.The resulting shoots are allowed to root on rooting media, and theresulting plants are transferred to nursery pots and propagated astransgenic plants.

Example 11 Transformation of Maize Cells with the Insecticidal Genes ofthe Invention

Maize ears are collected 8-12 days after pollination. Embryos areisolated from the ears, and those embryos 0.8-1.5 mm in size are usedfor transformation. Embryos are plated scutellum side-up on a suitableincubation media, such as DN62A5S media (3.98 g/L N6 Salts; 1 mL/L (of1000× Stock) N6 Vitamins; 800 mg/L L-Asparagine; 100 mg/L Myo-inositol;1.4 g/L L-Proline; 100 mg/L Casaminoacids; 50 g/L sucrose; 1 mL/L (of 1mg/mL Stock) 2,4-D), and incubated overnight at 25° C. in the dark.

The resulting explants are transferred to mesh squares (30-40 perplate), transferred onto osmotic media for 30-45 minutes, thentransferred to a beaming plate (see, for example, PCT Publication No.WO/0138514 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,240,842).

DNA constructs designed to express the genes of the invention in plantcells are accelerated into plant tissue using an aerosol beamaccelerator, using conditions essentially as described in PCTPublication No. WO/0138514. After beaming, embryos are incubated for 30min on osmotic media, then placed onto incubation media overnight at 25°C. in the dark. To avoid unduly damaging beamed explants, they areincubated for at least 24 hours prior to transfer to recovery media.Embryos are then spread onto recovery period media, for 5 days, 25° C.in the dark, then transferred to a selection media. Explants areincubated in selection media for up to eight weeks, depending on thenature and characteristics of the particular selection utilized. Afterthe selection period, the resulting callus is transferred to embryomaturation media, until the formation of mature somatic embryos isobserved. The resulting mature somatic embryos are then placed under lowlight, and the process of regeneration is initiated by methods known inthe art. The resulting shoots are allowed to root on rooting media, andthe resulting plants are transferred to nursery pots and propagated astransgenic plants.

Materials

DN62A5S Media Components per liter Source Chu'S N6 Basal Salt 3.98 g/LPhytotechnology Labs Mixture (Prod. No. C 416) Chu's N6 Vitamin Solution1 mL/L (of Phytotechnology Labs (Prod. No. C 149) 1000x Stock)L-Asparagine 800 mg/L Phytotechnology Labs Myo-inositol 100 mg/L SigmaL-Proline 1.4 g/L Phytotechnology Labs Casaminoacids 100 mg/L FisherScientific Sucrose 50 g/L Phytotechnology Labs 2,4-D (Prod. No. D-7299)1 mL/L (of Sigma 1 mg/mL Stock)

Adjust the pH of the solution to pH to 5.8 with 1N KOH/1N KCl, addGelrite (Sigma) to 3 g/L, and autoclave. After cooling to 50° C., add 2ml/l of a 5 mg/ml stock solution of Silver Nitrate (PhytotechnologyLabs). This recipe yields about 20 plates.

All publications and patent applications mentioned in the specificationare indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art towhich this invention pertains. All publications and patent applicationsare herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if eachindividual publication or patent application was specifically andindividually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail byway of illustration and example for purposes of clarity ofunderstanding, it will be obvious that certain changes and modificationsmay be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.

1. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a nucleotide sequenceselected from the group consisting of: a) the nucleotide sequence of anyof SEQ ID NO:3, 6, or 9, or a complement thereof; b) the nucleotidesequence selected from: i) nucleotides 61-1953 of SEQ ID NO:3; ii)nucleotides 160-1953 of SEQ ID NO:3; iii) nucleotides 4-1059 of SEQ IDNO:6; iv) nucleotides 13-1059 of SEQ ID NO:6; v) nucleotides 151-1059 ofSEQ ID NO:6; vi) nucleotides 19-1893 of SEQ ID NO:9; vii) nucleotides46-1893 of SEQ ID NO:9; and viii) nucleotides 52-1893 of SEQ ID NO:9; c)a nucleotide sequence that encodes a polypeptide comprising the aminoacid sequence of any of SEQ ID NO:4, 7, or 10; d) a nucleotide sequencethat encodes a polypeptide selected from: i) amino acids 54-651 of SEQID NO:4; ii) amino acids 2-352 of SEQ ID NO:7; iii) amino acids 5-352 ofSEQ ID NO:7; iv) amino acids 51-352 of SEQ ID NO:7; v) amino acids 7-630of SEQ ID NO:10; vi) amino acids 16-630 of SEQ ID NO:10; and vii) aminoacids 18-630 of SEQ ID NO:10; e) a nucleotide sequence that encodes apolypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence having at least 95%sequence identity to the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:4, 7, 10, orany of (d)(1-viii), wherein said amino acid sequence has pesticidalactivity against a plant pathogen.
 2. The isolated nucleic acid moleculeof claim 1, wherein said nucleotide sequence is a synthetic sequencethat has been designed for expression in a plant.
 3. The isolatednucleic acid of claim 1, wherein said nucleic acid sequence is selectedfrom SEQ ID NO:1, 5, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, or
 15. 4. A vector comprisingthe nucleic acid molecule of claim
 1. 5. The vector of claim 4, furthercomprising a nucleic acid molecule encoding a heterologous polypeptide.6. A host cell that contains the vector of claim
 4. 7. The host cell ofclaim 6 that is a bacterial host cell.
 8. The host cell of claim 6 thatis a plant cell.
 9. A transgenic plant comprising the host cell of claim8.
 10. The transgenic plant of claim 8, wherein said plant is selectedfrom the group consisting of maize, sorghum, wheat, cabbage, sunflower,tomato, crucifers, peppers, potato, cotton, rice, soybean, sugarbeet,sugarcane, tobacco, barley, and oilseed rape.
 11. A transgenic seedcomprising the nucleic acid molecule of claim
 1. 12. An isolatedpolypeptide with insecticidal activity, selected from the groupconsisting of: a) a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence ofany of SEQ ID NO:4, 7, or 10; b) a polypeptide that is encoded by thenucleotide sequence of any of SEQ ID NO:3, 6, or 9; c) a polypeptideselected from: i) amino acids 54-651 of SEQ ID NO:4; ii) amino acids2-352 of SEQ ID NO:7; iii) amino acids 5-352 of SEQ ID NO:7; iv) aminoacids 51-352 of SEQ ID NO:7; v) amino acids 7-630 of SEQ ID NO:10; vi)amino acids 16-630 of SEQ ID NO:10; and vii) amino acids 18-630 of SEQID NO:10; and d) a polypeptide that is at least 95% identical to theamino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:4, 7, 10, or any of (c)(i-viii),wherein said polypeptide has pesticidal activity against a plantpathogen.
 13. The polypeptide of claim 12 further comprisingheterologous amino acid sequences.
 14. An antibody that selectivelybinds to the polypeptide of claim
 12. 15. A composition comprising thepolypeptide of claim
 12. 16. The composition of claim 15, wherein saidcomposition is selected from the group consisting of a powder, dust,pellet, granule, spray, emulsion, colloid, and solution.
 17. Thecomposition of claim 15, wherein said composition is prepared bydesiccation, lyophilization, homogenization, extraction, filtration,centrifugation, sedimentation, or concentration of a culture of Bacillusthuringiensis cells.
 18. The composition of claim 16, comprising fromabout 1% to about 99% by weight of said polypeptide.
 19. A method forcontrolling a lepidopteran or coleopteran pest population comprisingcontacting said population with a insecticidally-effective amount of apolypeptide derived from a Brevibacillus organism.
 20. The method ofclaim 19, wherein said polypeptide is selected from the group consistingof: a) a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence of any of SEQ IDNO:4, 7, or 10; b) a polypeptide that is encoded by the nucleotidesequence of any of SEQ ID NO:3, 6, or 9; c) a polypeptide selected from:i) amino acids 21-651 of SEQ ID NO:4; ii) amino acids 54-651 of SEQ IDNO:4; iii) amino acids 2-352 of SEQ ID NO:7; iv) amino acids 5-352 ofSEQ ID NO:7; v) amino acids 51-352 of SEQ ID NO:7; vi) amino acids 7-630of SEQ ID NO:10; vii) amino acids 16-630 of SEQ ID NO:10; and viii)amino acids 18-630 of SEQ ID NO:10; and d) a polypeptide that is atleast 95% identical to the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:4, 7, 10, orany of (c)(i-viii), wherein said polypeptide has pesticidal activityagainst said lepidopteran or coleopteran pest.
 21. A method for killinga lepidopteran or coleopteran pest, comprising contacting said pestwith, or feeding to said pest, a insecticidally-effective amount of apolypeptide derived from a Brevibacillus organism.
 22. The method ofclaim 21, wherein said polypeptide is selected from the group consistingof: a) a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence of any of SEQ IDNO:4, 7, or 10; b) a polypeptide that is encoded by the nucleotidesequence of any of SEQ ID NO:3, 6, or 9; c) a polypeptide selected from:i) amino acids 21-651 of SEQ ID NO:4; ii) amino acids 54-651 of SEQ IDNO:4; iii) amino acids 2-352 of SEQ ID NO:7; iv) amino acids 5-352 ofSEQ ID NO:7; v) amino acids 51-352 of SEQ ID NO:7; vi) amino acids 7-630of SEQ ID NO:10; vii) amino acids 16-630 of SEQ ID NO:10; and viii)amino acids 18-630 of SEQ ID NO:10; and d) a polypeptide that is atleast 95% identical to the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:4, 7, 10, orany of (c)(i-viii), wherein said polypeptide has pesticidal activityagainst said lepidopteran or coleopteran pest.
 23. A method forproducing a polypeptide with insecticidal activity, comprising culturingthe host cell of claim 6 under conditions in which the nucleic acidmolecule encoding the polypeptide is expressed.
 24. A plant havingstably incorporated into its genome a DNA construct comprising anucleotide sequence that encodes a protein having insecticidal activity,wherein said nucleotide sequence is derived from a Brevibacillusorganism.
 25. The plant of claim 24, wherein said nucleotide sequence isselected from the group consisting of: a) the nucleotide sequence of anyof SEQ ID NO:3, 6, or 9, or a complement thereof; b) the nucleotidesequence selected from: i) nucleotides 61-1953 of SEQ ID NO:3; ii)nucleotides 160-1953 of SEQ ID NO:3; iii) nucleotides 4-1059 of SEQ IDNO:6; iv) nucleotides 13-1059 of SEQ ID NO:6; v) nucleotides 151-1059 ofSEQ ID NO:6; vi) nucleotides 19-1893 of SEQ ID NO:9; vii) nucleotides46-1893 of SEQ ID NO:9; and viii) nucleotides 52-1893 of SEQ ID NO:9; c)a nucleotide sequence that encodes a polypeptide comprising the aminoacid sequence of any of SEQ ID NO:4, 7, or 10; d) a nucleotide sequencethat encodes a polypeptide selected from: i) amino acids 21-651 of SEQID NO:4; ii) amino acids 54-651 of SEQ ID NO:4; iii) amino acids 2-352of SEQ ID NO:7; iv) amino acids 5-352 of SEQ ID NO:7; v) amino acids51-352 of SEQ ID NO:7; vi) amino acids 7-630 of SEQ ID NO:10; vii) aminoacids 16-630 of SEQ ID NO:10; and viii) amino acids 18-630 of SEQ IDNO:10; and e) a nucleotide sequence that encodes a polypeptidecomprising an amino acid sequence having at least 95% sequence identityto the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:4, 7, 10, or any of (d)(1-viii),wherein said amino acid sequence has pesticidal activity against a plantpathogen; wherein said nucleotide sequence is operably linked to apromoter that drives expression of a coding sequence in a plant cell.26. The plant of claim 24, wherein said plant is a plant cell.
 27. Amethod for protecting a plant from an insect pest, comprisingintroducing into said plant or cell thereof at least one expressionvector comprising a nucleotide sequence that encodes a insecticidalpolypeptide, wherein said nucleotide sequence is derived from aBrevibacillus organism.
 28. The method of claim 27, wherein saidnucleotide sequence is selected from the group consisting of: a) thenucleotide sequence of any of SEQ ID NO:3, 6, or 9, or a complementthereof; b) the nucleotide sequence selected from: i) nucleotides61-1953 of SEQ ID NO:3; ii) nucleotides 160-1953 of SEQ ID NO:3; iii)nucleotides 4-1059 of SEQ ID NO:6; iv) nucleotides 13-1059 of SEQ IDNO:6; v) nucleotides 151-1059 of SEQ ID NO:6; vi) nucleotides 19-1893 ofSEQ ID NO:9; vii) nucleotides 46-1893 of SEQ ID NO:9; and viii)nucleotides 52-1893 of SEQ ID NO:9; c) a nucleotide sequence thatencodes a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence of any of SEQID NO:4, 7, or 10; d) a nucleotide sequence that encodes a polypeptideselected from: i) amino acids 21-651 of SEQ ID NO:4; ii) amino acids54-651 of SEQ ID NO:4; iii) amino acids 2-352 of SEQ ID NO:7; iv) aminoacids 5-352 of SEQ ID NO:7; v) amino acids 51-352 of SEQ ID NO:7; vi)amino acids 7-630 of SEQ ID NO:10; vii) amino acids 16-630 of SEQ IDNO:10; and viii) amino acids 18-630 of SEQ ID NO:10; and e) a nucleotidesequence that encodes a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequencehaving at least 95% sequence identity to the amino acid sequence of SEQID NO:4, 7, 10, or any of (d)(1-viii), wherein said amino acid sequencehas pesticidal activity against a plant pathogen.
 29. The method ofclaim 28, wherein said plant produces a polypeptide having insecticidalactivity against a lepidopteran or coleopteran pest.